Cited by 317Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial of orlistat for the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Open access
Zelber–Sagi, Shira, Kessler, Ada, Brazowsky, Eli, Webb, Muriel, Lurie, Yoav, Santo, Moshe, Leshno, Moshe, Blendis, Laurence +2 more·2006·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background & aims Few controlled studies have addressed the issue of effective medical treatment for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We herein assessed the effect of orlistat in patients with NAFLD. Methods We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on 52 patients with NAFLD diagnosed by ultrasound (US) and confirmed by liver biopsy (40 patients). The patients were randomized to receive either orlistat (120 mg 3 times daily for 6 months) or placebo. All patients participated in an identical behavioral weight loss program. All patients underwent monthly evaluation by abdominal US; liver enzyme levels, lipid profiles, insulin levels, and anthropometric parameters were monitored, and all patients underwent nutritional follow-up evaluation. Twenty-two patients underwent a second liver biopsy examination at the end of the study. Results Fifty-two patients were recruited and 44 (mean age, 47.7 y; mean body mass index, 33) completed the study. Serum glucose and insulin levels (P<.03) were significantly higher in the orlistat group, which also presented a higher degree of fibrosis. Body mass index was reduced significantly in each group, with a nonsignificant difference between the groups. Serum alanine transaminase (ALT) levels decreased significantly in both groups, with an almost 2-fold reduction in the orlistat group (48% vs 26.4%). There was a statistically significant reversal of fatty liver by US only in the orlistat group (P<.05). Conclusions Orlistat improves serum ALT levels and steatosis on US in NAFLD patients, beyond its effect on weight reduction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.02.004

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zelber–Sagi, S., Kessler, A., Brazowsky, E., Webb, M., Lurie, Y., Santo, M., Leshno, M., Blendis, L., Halpern, Z., & Oren, R.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Oren, Ran
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
639-644
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154075360
Cited by
317
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
18.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
orlistat, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, weight loss, steatosis, liver fibrosis, alanine aminotransferase, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, lipid profile
MeSH terms
Orlistat, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Biopsy, Needle, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Fatty Liver, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Lactones, Liver Function Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Probability, Reference Values, Severity of Illness Index, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Anti-Obesity Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review