Cited by 209Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

A Stable Isotope Breath Test With a Standard Meal for Abnormal Gastric Emptying of Solids in the Clinic and in Research

Open access
Szarka, Lawrence A., Camilleri, Michael, Vella, Adrian, Burton, Duane, Baxter, Kari, Simonson, Julie, Zinsmeister, Alan R.·2008·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background & aims The aim of this study was to validate a [13C]-Spirulina platensis gastric emptying (GE) breath test (GEBT) with a standardized meal. Methods Thirty-eight healthy volunteers and 129 patients with clinically suspected delayed GE underwent measurements at 45, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 240 minutes after a 238 kcal meal labeled test with 100 mg [13C]-S platensis and 0.5 mCi 99mTc. We established normal ranges for scintigraphy with this test meal, intraindividual and interindividual coefficients of variation (COVs), and the ability of the [13C] GEBT breath percent dose excreted *1000 values to predict scintigraphic half-life and to categorize GE as delayed, normal, or accelerated. Results In health, the 10th and 90th percentiles of half-life for scintigraphic GE with this meal were 52 and 86 minutes; intraindividual COVs for scintigraphy and the GEBT were, respectively, 31% and 27% at 45 minutes, 17% and 21% at 90 minutes, 13% and 16% at 120 minutes, 10% and 13% at 150 minutes, and 8% and 12% at 180 minutes. Interindividual COVs at each time for the [13C] GEBT and scintigraphy were typically approximately 1%-4% lower than intraindividual COVs. Individual breath samples at 45, 150, and 180 minutes predicted GE category; at 80% specificity, 45- and 180-minute samples combined were 93% sensitive to identify accelerated GE, and 150- and 180-minute combined were 89% sensitive for delayed GE. Conclusions [13C]-S platensis GEBT is as reproducible as scintigraphy; imprecision with both tests reflects physiologic variation. With 4 breath samples, this method with an off-the-shelf meal is valid to assess GE in clinic and in research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.01.009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results of the 13C breath test can be influenced by extra gastric factors such as liver function, pulmonary disease, and small-intestinal absorption kinetics.

    “However, results can be influenced by extra gastric factors such as liver function, pulmonary disease, and small-intestinal absorption kinetics [3, 14, 66, 69, 70].”

    From Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices (2026) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Substrate section says the label must be digested, absorbed, and metabolized before it appears in breath CO₂. The Discussion says participants with clinically apparent malabsorption or significant liver disease were excluded. These passages support a role for processes beyond gastric emptying, but the paper does not identify pulmonary disease as an influence or quantify how the listed factors affect results. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 209

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Ghoos YF, Maes BD, Geypens BJ, et al. Measurement of gastric emptying rate of solids by means of a carbon-labeled octanoic acid breath test. Gastroenterology 1993;104:1640 -1647.
  2. Choi M-G, Camilleri M, Burton DD, et al. 13C-octanoic acid breath test for gastric emptying of solids: accuracy, reproduc- ibility and comparison with scintigraphy. Gastroenterology 1997;112:1155-1162.
  3. Choi M-G, Camilleri M, Burton DD, et al. Reproducibility and simplification of 13C-octanoic acid breath test for gastric empty- ing of solids. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:92-98.
  4. Lee JS, Camilleri M, Zinsmeister AR, et al. A valid, accurate, office based non-radioactive test for gastric emptying of solids. Gut 2000;46:768 -773.
  5. Lee J-S, Camilleri M, Zinsmeister AR, et al. Toward office-based measurement of gastric emptying in symptomatic diabetics using [13C]octanoic acid breath test. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95: 2751-2761.
  6. Viramontes BE, Kim D-Y, Camilleri M, et al. Validation of a stable isotope gastric emptying test for normal, accelerated or delayed gastric emptying. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2001;13:567-574.
  7. Ciferri O, Tiboni O. The biochemistry and industrial potential of Spirulina. Ann Rev Microbiol 1985;39:503-526.
  8. Dillon JC, Phuc AP, Dubacq JP. Nutritional value of the alga Spirulina. World Rev Nutr Dietetics 1995;77:32-46.
  9. Ricci E. Determination of carbon-12, carbon-13 isotopic abun- dances and nitrogen-carbon ratios in biological substances by proton-reaction analysis. Analyt Chem 1971;43:1866 -1871.
  10. Klein PD. Clinical applications of 13CO2 measurements. Feder- ation Proceedings 1982;41:2698 -2701.
  11. Schoeller DA, Schneider JF, Solomons NW, et al. Clinical diagno- sis with the stable isotope 13C in CO2 breath tests: methodology and fundamental considerations. J Lab Clin Med 1977;90:412-421.
  12. Schofield WN. Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1985;39:541-549.
  13. Carrasco JL, Jover L. Estimating the generalized concordance correlation coefficient through variance components. Biometrics 2003;59:849 -858.
  14. Klein PD, Malaty HM, Czinn SJ, et al. Normalizing results of 13C-urea breath testing for CO2 production rates in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999;29:297-301.
  15. Engelgau MM, Geiss LS, Saaddine JB, et al. The evolving diabe- tes burden in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:945-950.
  16. Koch KL. Diabetic gastropathy: gastric neuromuscular dysfunc- tion in diabetes mellitus-a review of symptoms, pathophysiol- ogy, and treatment. Dig Dis Sci 1999;44:1061-1075.
  17. Rayner CK, Samsom M, Jones KL, et al. Relationships of upper gastrointestinal motor and sensory function with glycemic con- trol. Diabetes Care 2001;24:371-381.
  18. Schmitz O, Brock B, Rungby J. Amylin agonists: a novel approach in the treatment of diabetes. Diabetes 2004;53:S233-S238.
  19. Drucker DJ. Minireview: the glucagon-like peptides. Endocrinol- ogy 2001;142:521-527.
  20. Abell TL, Camilleri M, Donohoe K, et al. Consensus recommen- dations for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a Joint Report of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and the American Neurogastroenter- ology and Motility Society. To be published simultaneously in Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:753-763. and J Nucl Med Technol 2008;36:44 -54.

Authors
Szarka, L. A., Camilleri, M., Vella, A., Burton, D., Baxter, K., Simonson, J., & Zinsmeister, A. R.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Szarka, Lawrence A.
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
635-643.e1
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165046753
Cited by
209
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24 DK02638, K24DK002638, R01DK067071, R01DK078646, R01-DK67071)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-024150, UL1RR024150)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
gastric emptying, scintigraphy, test reproducibility, delayed gastric emptying, test validation, technetium-99m
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Breath Tests, Carbon Isotopes, Female, Gastric Emptying, Half-Life, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Radionuclide Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stomach Diseases, Technetium, Time Factors, Area Under Curve, Spirulina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review