Cited by 126Celiac Disease Research and ManagementEosinophilic EsophagitisWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology

Natural History of Potential Celiac Disease in Children

Tosco, Antonella, Salvati, Virginia Michela, Auricchio, Renata, Maglio, Mariantonia, Borrelli, Melissa, Coruzzo, Anna, Paparo, Francesco, Boffardi, Massimo +5 more·2011·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background & aims The presence of celiac disease-associated autoantibodies (antiendomysium and antitissue transglutaminase [anti-TG2]) with normal jejunal mucosa indicate potential celiac disease. We performed a prospective, 3-year cohort study to determine the natural history of potential celiac disease in children. Methods The study included 106 children with potential celiac disease, based on serology analysis and normal duodenal architecture. All but 2 carried the HLA-DQ2 and/or DQ8 haplotype. In all children, every 6 months, growth, nutritional parameters, celiac disease serology, and autoimmunity were investigated. In biopsies, γδ intraepithelial-, CD3-, and lamina propria CD25-positive cells were counted; duodenal deposits of anti-TG2 immunoglobulin A were detected. Biopsy analysis was repeated after 2 years on patients with persistent positive serology and/or symptoms. Results Celiac disease was detected primarily in first-degree relatives and patients with autoimmune disorders (40.6%). A gluten-free diet was prescribed to 20/106 patients because of symptoms, which were relieved in only 11. Eighty-nine of the 106 patients entered the follow-up study, with normal daily consumption of gluten. During the follow-up antibodies disappeared in 14.6% and fluctuated in 32.6%. Villous atrophy was observed in 12/39 patients (30.8%) who underwent a repeat biopsy. Conclusions Most children with potential celiac disease remain healthy. After 3 years, approximately 33% of patients d…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.09.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tosco, A., Salvati, V. M., Auricchio, R., Maglio, M., Borrelli, M., Coruzzo, A., Paparo, F., Boffardi, M., Esposito, A., D'Adamo, G., Malamisura, B., Greco, L., & Troncone, R.
Affiliations
  • Federico II University Hospital (IT)
  • Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno (IT)
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
320-325
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134450123
Cited by
126
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Keywords
children, anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, anti-endomysial antibodies, villous atrophy, duodenal biopsy, HLA-DQ2, HLA-DQ8, gluten-free diet, autoimmunity, natural history (disease), first-degree relatives, autoimmune disease
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Autoantibodies, Biopsy, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Intestinal Mucosa, Jejunum, Male, Prospective Studies, Asymptomatic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review