Cited by 67Liver Diseases and ImmunityPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsIgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases

Prevalence of Primary Biliary Cirrhosis–Autoimmune Hepatitis Overlap Syndrome

Open access
Bonder, Alan, Retana, Alexandra, Winston, Diana M., Leung, John, Kaplan, Marshall M.·2011·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background & aims The prevalence of and the most appropriate way to diagnose the primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC)-chronic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) overlap syndrome are uncertain. We investigated the prevalence of PBC and AIH and their level of overlap at a tertiary referral center, along with clinical, biochemical, and serologic characteristics. Methods We reviewed data from all patients with PBC (n = 609) and/or AIH (n = 15) examined at the Tufts Medical Center (Boston, MA) from January 1, 2000, to June 20, 2006. PBC was diagnosed based on 2 of the following 3 results: 6 months of positive results in tests for cholestatic liver enzymes, a positive result in a test for antimitochondrial antibodies, or a liver biopsy that indicated PBC. AIH was defined as an alanine aminotransferase level of 200 U/L or greater (≥ 5-fold above normal), a liver biopsy that indicated severe interface hepatitis, and levels of immunoglobulin G 2-fold or greater than that of normal. Results Only 6 patients with PBC (1%) met the Paris criteria for the overlap syndrome. If we included 9 patients with PBC who did not meet the Paris criteria, but had results from liver enzyme tests and liver biopsy analyses that indicated improvement after treatment with prednisone, the prevalence was 15 (2.8%). This is at the low end of previously reported prevalence values for overlap of PBC and AIH (2%-20%). Conclusions The prevalence of the PBC-AIH overlap syndrome varies among medical centers. We propose that if the definition of PBC-AIH overlap syndrome be modified to include patients with unequivocal responses to prednisone despite not meeting the Paris criteria, this would improve treatment of patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.019

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonder, A., Retana, A., Winston, D. M., Leung, J., & Kaplan, M. M.
Affiliations
Tufts Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kaplan, Marshall M.
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
609-612
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971061960
Cited by
67
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › IgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases
Keywords
primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis, overlap syndrome, prevalence, Paris criteria, prednisone response, antimitochondrial antibodies, interface hepatitis, IgG, cholestatic liver enzymes
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Adult, Aged, Autoantibodies, Boston, Enzymes, Female, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Liver Function Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Prevalence, Hepatitis, Autoimmune

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review