Improved Real-Time Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Following a Comprehensive Training Program
Abstract
Background & aims The optimal training method for endoscopic characterization of colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging is uncertain, and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) optical diagnosis data are lacking. We aimed to evaluate a comprehensive training program for real-time optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps, including SSLs. Methods We performed a single-institution prospective study of 15 endoscopists trained with the Workgroup Serrated Polyps and Polyposis classification system. After the first phase of in vivo optical diagnosis, their performances were evaluated. After re-education for insufficient competency, they began the second phase. The learning curves and performance on 2 preservation and incorporation of valuable endoscopic innovations benchmarks were assessed. Results A total of 7294 polyps, including 486 SSLs, were diagnosed in real-time. The overall accuracy improved from 73.5% in the first phase to 77.1% in the second. The accuracy with high confidence was 79.4% and 85.1% in the first and second phases, respectively. In the first and second phases, the negative predictive values for diminutive neoplastic polyps were 82.1% and 92.5%, respectively, and concordances of the surveillance intervals were 80.7% and 89.7%, respectively. Eight endoscopists achieved the preservation and incorporation of valuable endoscopic innovations benchmarks after the second phase compared with none after the first. In contrast, the high confidence rate decreased from 74.6% to…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Attaining proficiency in optical diagnosis and meeting the SODA or PIVI standards can be particularly challenging for novices.
“Attaining proficiency in optical diagnosis and meeting the accurate standards established by Simple Optical Diagnosis Accuracy (SODA) or Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations (PIVI) can be particularly challenging for novices.2,7,8”
From Structured Integration of an Artificial Intelligence-Based System for the Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
Cites
Abu Dayyeh, B. K., Thosani, N., Konda, V., Wallace, M. B., Rex, D. K., Chauhan, S. S., Hwang, J. H., Komanduri, S., Manfredi, M., Maple, J. T., et al. (2015) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kang, H. Y., Kang, S., Chung, G. E., Baek, D. H., Lee, H. S., Park, J., Yang, S. Y., Lim, S. H., Choi, J. M., Kim, J., et al. (2026) · Gut and Liver · doi:10.5009/gnl250331
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bae, J. H., Lee, C., Kang, H. Y., Kwak, M.-S., Doo, E. Y., Seo, J. Y., Song, J. H., Yang, S. Y., Yang, J. I., Lim, S. H., Yim, J. Y., Lim, J. H., Chung, G. E., Chung, S. J., Jin, E. H., Park, B., & Kim, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Joo Sung
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2479-2488.e4
- ISSN
- 1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2911260667
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Seoul National University Hospital (04-2015-0770)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- colorectal polyps, sessile serrated lesions, narrow-band imaging, optical diagnostics, endoscopist training, learning curve, surveillance interval, interindividual variability
- MeSH terms
- Adenoma, Clinical Competence, Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, Education, Medical, Continuing, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Rectal Neoplasms, Sensitivity and Specificity, Learning Curve, Narrow Band Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review