Cited by 110Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchPancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Increases Accuracy of Differentiation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions

Krishna, Somashekar G., Hart, Phil A., Malli, Ahmad, Kruger, Andrew J., McCarthy, Sean T., El-Dika, Samer, Walker, Jon P., Dillhoff, Mary E. +7 more·2020·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background & aims Imaging patterns from endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) have been associated with specific pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). We compared the accuracy of EUS with nCLE in differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous PCLs with that of measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytology analysis. Methods We performed a prospective study of 144 consecutive patients with a suspected PCL (≥20 mm) who underwent EUS with fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts from June 2015 through December 2018 at a single center; 65 patients underwent surgical resection. Surgical samples were analyzed by histology (reference standard). During EUS, the needle with the miniprobe was placed in the cyst, which was analyzed by nCLE. Fluid was aspirated and analyzed for level of CEA and by cytology. We compared the accuracy of nCLE in differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous lesions with that of measurement of CEA and cytology analysis. Results The mean size of dominant cysts was 36.4 ± 15.7 mm and the mean duration of nCLE imaging was 7.3 ± 2.8 min. Among the 65 subjects with surgically resected cysts analyzed histologically, 86.1% had at least 1 worrisome feature based on the 2012 Fukuoka criteria. Measurement of CEA and cytology analysis identified mucinous PCLs with 74% sensitivity, 61% specificity, and 71% accuracy. EUS with nCLE identified mucinous PCLs with 98% sensitivity, 94% specificity, and 97% accuracy. nCLE was more accurate in classifying mucinous vs nonmucinous cysts than the standard method (P < .001). The overall incidence of postprocedure acute pancreatitis was 3.5% (5 of 144); all episodes were mild, based on the revised Atlanta criteria. Conclusions In a prospective study, we found that analysis of cysts by nCLE identified mucinous cysts with greater accuracy than measurement of CEA and cytology analysis. EUS with nCLE can be used to differentiate mucinous from nonmucinous PCLs. ClincialTrials.gov no: NCT02516488.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.06.010

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have shown good sensitivity with excellent specificity for differentiating benign cysts that require no follow-up from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

    “Studies have shown good sensitivity with excellent specificity for differentiating between benign cysts that require no follow-up and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.44–46”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [44]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krishna, S. G., Hart, P. A., Malli, A., Kruger, A. J., McCarthy, S. T., El-Dika, S., Walker, J. P., Dillhoff, M. E., Manilchuk, A., Schmidt, C. R., Pawlik, T. M., Porter, K., Arnold, C. A., Cruz-Monserrate, Z., & Conwell, D. L.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Krishna, Somashekar G.
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
432-440.e6
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950574333
Cited by
110
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American College of Gastroenterology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Keywords
pancreatic cysts, needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, mucinous pancreatic cysts, carcinoembryonic antigen, fine needle aspiration cytology, diagnostic accuracy, pancreatic cyst classification, pancreatic neoplasms
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Humans, Lasers, Pancreatic Cyst, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pancreatitis, Prospective Studies, Microscopy, Confocal, Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review