Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Increases Accuracy of Differentiation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions
Abstract
Background & aims Imaging patterns from endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) have been associated with specific pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). We compared the accuracy of EUS with nCLE in differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous PCLs with that of measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytology analysis. Methods We performed a prospective study of 144 consecutive patients with a suspected PCL (≥20 mm) who underwent EUS with fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts from June 2015 through December 2018 at a single center; 65 patients underwent surgical resection. Surgical samples were analyzed by histology (reference standard). During EUS, the needle with the miniprobe was placed in the cyst, which was analyzed by nCLE. Fluid was aspirated and analyzed for level of CEA and by cytology. We compared the accuracy of nCLE in differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous lesions with that of measurement of CEA and cytology analysis. Results The mean size of dominant cysts was 36.4 ± 15.7 mm and the mean duration of nCLE imaging was 7.3 ± 2.8 min. Among the 65 subjects with surgically resected cysts analyzed histologically, 86.1% had at least 1 worrisome feature based on the 2012 Fukuoka criteria. Measurement of CEA and cytology analysis identified mucinous PCLs with 74% sensitivity, 61% specificity, and 71% accuracy. EUS with nCLE identified mucinous PCLs with 98% sensitivity, 94% specificity, and 97% accuracy. nCLE was more accurate in classifying mucinous vs nonmucinous cysts than the standard method (P < .001). The overall incidence of postprocedure acute pancreatitis was 3.5% (5 of 144); all episodes were mild, based on the revised Atlanta criteria. Conclusions In a prospective study, we found that analysis of cysts by nCLE identified mucinous cysts with greater accuracy than measurement of CEA and cytology analysis. EUS with nCLE can be used to differentiate mucinous from nonmucinous PCLs. ClincialTrials.gov no: NCT02516488.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies have shown good sensitivity with excellent specificity for differentiating benign cysts that require no follow-up from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.
“Studies have shown good sensitivity with excellent specificity for differentiating between benign cysts that require no follow-up and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.44–46”
From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Banks, P. A., Bollen, T. L., Dervenis, C., Gooszen, H. G., Johnson, C. D., Sarr, M. G., Tsiotos, G. G., & Vege, S. S. (2013) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779 · Cited by 7,187 · see citing works
International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas
Tanaka, M., Fernández-del Castillo, C., Adsay, V., Chari, S., Falconi, M., Jang, J.-Y., Kimura, W., Levy, P., Pitman, M. B., Schmidt, C. M., et al. (2012) · Pancreatology · doi:10.1016/j.pan.2012.04.004 · Cited by 2,354 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Early detection of pancreatic cancer
Pereira, S. P., Oldfield, L., Ney, A., Hart, P. A., Keane, M. G., Pandol, S. J., Li, D., Greenhalf, W., Jeon, C. Y., Koay, E. J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30416-9 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Self-citationJiang, J., Chao, W.-L., Culp, S., & Krishna, S. G. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15092410 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Krishna, S. G., Hart, P. A., Malli, A., Kruger, A. J., McCarthy, S. T., El-Dika, S., Walker, J. P., Dillhoff, M. E., Manilchuk, A., Schmidt, C. R., Pawlik, T. M., Porter, K., Arnold, C. A., Cruz-Monserrate, Z., & Conwell, D. L.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Krishna, Somashekar G.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 432-440.e6
- ISSN
- 1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2950574333
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American College of Gastroenterology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
- Keywords
- pancreatic cysts, needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, mucinous pancreatic cysts, carcinoembryonic antigen, fine needle aspiration cytology, diagnostic accuracy, pancreatic cyst classification, pancreatic neoplasms
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Humans, Lasers, Pancreatic Cyst, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pancreatitis, Prospective Studies, Microscopy, Confocal, Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review