The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
First- and Second-Line Pharmacotherapies for Patients With Moderate to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: An Updated Network Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background & Aims: We compared the efficacy and safety of different first-line (biologic-naïve) and second-line (prior exposure to tumor necrosis factor [TNF] antagonists) agents for treatment of moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis in a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Methods: We searched publication databases through September 30, 2019 for randomized trials of adults with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis treated with TNF antagonists, vedolizumab, tofacitinib, or ustekinumab, as first-line or second-line agents, compared with placebo or another active agent. Efficacy outcomes were induction and maintenance of remission and endoscopic improvement; safety outcomes were serious adverse events and infections. We performed fixed-effects network meta-analysis using frequentist approach, and calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI values. Agents were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Results: In biologic-naïve patients, infliximab was ranked highest for induction of clinical remission (OR vs placebo, 4.07; 95% CI, 2.67–6.21; SUCRA,0.95) and endoscopic improvement (SUCRA, 0.95) (moderate confidence in estimates [CE]). In patients with prior exposure to TNF antagonists, ustekinumab (SUCRA,0.87) and tofacitinib (SUCRA,0.87) were ranked highest for induction of clinical remission and were superior to vedolizumab (OR vs ustekinumab, 5.99; 95% CI, 1.13–31.76 and OR vs tofacitinib, 6.18; 95% CI, 1.003–8.00; moderate CE) and adalimumab (OR vs ustekinumab, 10.71; 95% CI, 2.01–57.20 and OR vs tofacitinib, 11.05; 95% CI, 1.79–68.41; moderate CE). Vedolizumab had lowest risk of infections (SUCRA, 0.81), followed by ustekinumab (SUCRA, 0.63) in maintenance trials. Conclusions: In a systematic review and network meta-analysis, we found infliximab to be ranked highest in biologic-naïve patients, and ustekinumab and tofacitinib were ranked highest in patients with prior exposure to TNF antagonists, for induction of remission and endoscopic improvement in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. More trials of direct comparisons are needed to inform clinical decision-making with greater confidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
(2019) · doi:10.1002/9781119536604 · Cited by 14,828
Hutton, B., Salanti, G., Caldwell, D. M., Chaimani, A., Schmid, C. H., Cameron, C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Straus, S., Thorlund, K., Jansen, J. P., et al. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-2385 · Cited by 8,269
Ng, S. C., Shi, H. Y., Hamidi, N., Underwood, F. E., Tang, W., Benchimol, E. I., Panaccione, R., Ghosh, S., Wu, J. C. Y., Chan, F. K. L., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32448-0 · Cited by 6,087
Infliximab for Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis
Rutgeerts, P., Sandborn, W. J., Feagan, B. G., Reinisch, W., Olson, A., Johanns, J., Travers, S., Rachmilewitz, D., Hanauer, S. B., Lichtenstein, G. R., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa050516 · Cited by 3,902
Self-citationSalanti, G., Ades, A. E., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016 · Cited by 3,766
Vedolizumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis
Feagan, B. G., Rutgeerts, P., Sands, B. E., Hanauer, S., Colombel, J.-F., Sandborn, W. J., Van Assche, G., Axler, J., Kim, H.-J., Danese, S., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1215734 · Cited by 2,888
Self-citationPuhan, M. A., Schunemann, H. J., Murad, M. H., Li, T., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Singh, J. A., Kessels, A. G., Guyatt, G. H., & for the GRADE Working Group (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g5630 · Cited by 1,812
Self-citationTofacitinib as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis
Sandborn, W. J., Su, C., Sands, B. E., D’Haens, G. R., Vermeire, S., Schreiber, S., Danese, S., Feagan, B. G., Reinisch, W., Niezychowski, W., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1606910 · Cited by 1,770
Self-citation
Cited by
Lasa, J. S., Olivera, P. A., Danese, S., & Peyrin-Biroulet, L. (2022) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00377-0 · Cited by 384
Targeting sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling in immune-mediated diseases: beyond multiple sclerosis
Pérez-Jeldres, T., Alvarez-Lobos, M., & Rivera-Nieves, J. (2021) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-021-01528-8 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, S., Murad, M. H., Fumery, M., Dulai, P. S., & Sandborn, W. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2179-2191.e6
- ISSN
- 1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000124921
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 29.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First- and Second-Line Pharmacotherapies for Patients With Moderate to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: An Updated Network Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.01.008
- The paper
- Singh, S., Murad, M. H., Fumery, M., Dulai, P. S., & Sandborn, W. J. (2020). First- and Second-Line Pharmacotherapies for Patients With Moderate to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: An Updated Network Meta-Analysis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.01.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.