Cited by 16Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Diseases and ImmunityGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Prevalence and determinants of liver disease in relatives of Italian patients with advanced MASLD

Open access
Pelusi, Serena, Ronzoni, Luisa, Rondena, Jessica, Rosso, Chiara, Pennisi, Grazia, Dongiovanni, Paola, Margarita, Sara, Carpani, Rossana +6 more·2024·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has a strong genetic component. The aim of this study was to examine noninvasively the prevalence of MASLD and of advanced fibrosis in relatives of patients with advanced MASLD and the risk factors for liver involvement, with a focus on the contribution of common genetic risk variants. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 98 consecutive probands with advanced fibrosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma caused by MASLD and 160 nontwin first-degree relatives noninvasively screened for MASLD and advanced fibrosis at 4 Italian centers. We evaluated common genetic determinants and polygenic risk scores of liver disease. RESULTS: Among relatives, prevalence of MASLD was 56.8% overall, whereas advanced fibrosis was observed in 14.4%. At multivariable analysis in relatives, MASLD was associated with body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 1.31 [1.18-1.46]) and tended to be associated with diabetes (OR, 5.21 [0.97-28.10]), alcohol intake (OR, 1.32 [0.98-1.78]), and with female sex (OR, 0.54 [0.23-1.15]), whereas advanced fibrosis was associated with diabetes (OR, 3.13 [1.16-8.45]) and nearly with body mass index (OR, 1.09 [1.00-1.19]). Despite that the PNPLA3 risk variant was enriched in probands (P = .003) and overtransmitted to relatives with MASLD (P = .045), evaluation of genetic risk variants and polygenic risk scores was not useful to guide noninvasive screening of advanced fibrosis in relatives. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that about 1 in 7 relatives of patients with advanced MASLD has advanced fibrosis, supporting clinical recommendations to perform family screening in this setting. Genetic risk variants contributed to liver disease within families but did not meaningfully improve fibrosis risk stratification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.12.033

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial data suggest that individuals with strong family history, early disease onset, or lack of accruing factors may benefit from a comprehensive genetic evaluation that may identify strong genetic determinants of SLD with potential implications for treatment and family counselling.

    “Initial data suggest that individuals with a) strong family history, b) early disease onset, or c) lack of accruing factors may bene fi t from a comprehensive genetic evaluation ( e.g. whole-exome sequencing or targeted panel sequencing) that may identify strong genetic determinants of SLD with potential implications for treatment and family counselling. 135,208 -211”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [211]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 16

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, et al. A multi-society Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. J Hepatol 2023;79:1542-1556.
  2. Caussy C, Soni M, Cui J, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with cirrhosis increases familial risk for advanced fibrosis. J Clin Invest 2017;127:2697-2704.
  3. Tamaki N, Ahlholm N, Luukkonen PK, et al. Risk of advanced fibrosis in first-degree relatives of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Invest 2022;132:e162513.
  4. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis: 2021 update. J Hepatol 2021; 75:659-689.
  5. Valenti L, Pelusi S, Bianco C, et al. Definition of healthy ranges for alanine aminotransferase levels: a 2021 update. Hepatol Commun 2021;5:1824-1832.
  6. Valenti L, Tripodi A, La Mura V, et al. Clinical and genetic de- terminants of the fatty liver-coagulation balance interplay in in- dividuals with metabolic dysfunction. JHEP Rep 2022;4:100598.

Authors
Pelusi, S., Ronzoni, L., Rondena, J., Rosso, C., Pennisi, G., Dongiovanni, P., Margarita, S., Carpani, R., Soardo, G., Prati, D., Cespiati, A., Petta, S., Bugianesi, E., & Valenti, L.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • University of Palermo (IT)
  • University of Udine (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Valenti, Luca
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
22
Issue
11
Pages
2231-2239.e4
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390741789
Cited by
16
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Ministero dell'Istruzione dell'Universita e della Ricerca
  • European Commission (PE00000019 CUP B73C22001250006, RF-2021-12372399, H2020-ICT-2018-20/H2020-ICT-2020-2, IN-IT-989-5790, HORIZON-MISS-2021-CANCER-02-03)
  • Horizon 2020
  • Ministero della Salute (RF-2016-02364358, PR-0361, PNRR-MAD-2022-12375656, RF-2021-12373889)
  • ERC (101016726, 101096312, 777377)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, advanced liver fibrosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, family screening, first-degree relatives, genetic risk variants, PNPLA3, polygenic risk score, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, alcohol consumption, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Family, Fatty Liver, Female, Humans, Italy, Lipase, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Membrane Proteins, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review