Cited by 7Fractional Differential Equations SolutionsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesMathematical and Theoretical Analysis

Representations of the fractional d’Alembertian and initial conditions in fractional dynamics

Open access
Calcagni, Gianluca, Nardelli, Giuseppe·2025·Chaos, Solitons & Fractals

Abstract

We construct representations of complex powers of the d’Alembertian operator □ in Lorentzian signature and pinpoint one which is self-adjoint and suitable for classical and quantum fractional field theory. This self-adjoint fractional d’Alembertian is associated with complex-conjugate poles, which are removed from the physical spectrum via the Anselmi–Piva prescription. As an example of empty spectrum, we consider a purely fractional propagator and its Källén–Lehmann representation. Using a cleaned-up version of the diffusion method, we formulate and solve the problem of initial conditions of the classical dynamics with a standard plus a fractional d’Alembertian, showing that the number of initial conditions is two. We generalize this result to a much wider class of nonlocal theories and discuss its applications to quantum gravity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117401

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Calcagni, G., & Nardelli, G.
Affiliations
  • Instituto de Estructura de la Materia (ES)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Calcagni, Gianluca
Venue
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-12
Volume
201
Pages
117401
ISSN
0960-0779 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415037618
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chaos Solitons & Fractals (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • PubliCatt (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2023-149018NB-C41)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Fractional Differential Equations Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis
Keywords
self-adjoint operators, Lorentzian signature, complex conjugate poles, Källén-Lehmann representation, diffusion method, initial conditions, nonlocal field theory, quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review