Cited by 66Technology Use by Older AdultsIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Home-based Communication System for Older Adults and Their Remote Family

Rodríguez, Marcela D., Gonzalez, Victor M., Favela, Jesus, Santana, Pedro C.·2009·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.017

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodríguez, M. D., Gonzalez, V. M., Favela, J., & Santana, P. C.
Affiliations
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (MX)
Corresponding author
Rodríguez, Marcela D.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
609-618
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045652866
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
older adults, intergenerational migration, family separation, social ties, prototype testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review