The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A social network as information: The effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004) · BT Technology Journal · doi:10.1023/b:bttj.0000047585.06264.cc · Cited by 1,399
Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x · Cited by 1,394
Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement
McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759909376464 · Cited by 1,236
Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x · Cited by 732
What makes Web sites credible?: a report on a large quantitative study
Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., Fang, N., Paul, J., Rangnekar, A., Shon, J., Swani, P., et al. (2001) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/365024.365037 · Cited by 685 · cited 2×
“To date, research has examined several other avenues with regard to online credibility, including site design features (e.g., Fogg et al., 2001), source attributions (e.g., Sundar & Nass, 2001), and the role of users’ reliance on web-based information (e.g., Johnson & Kaye, 2002).”
Background
Cited by
Social Media as Information Source: Recency of Updates and Credibility of Information
Westerman, D., Spence, P. R., & Van Der Heide, B. (2014) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12041 · Cited by 708
Self-citationJanssen, L., Schouten, A. P., & Croes, E. A. J. (2022) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1994205 · Cited by 350
Lee, J. A., Sudarshan, S., Sussman, K. L., Bright, L. F., & Eastin, M. S. (2022) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1964226 · Cited by 265
Factors Influencing Information credibility on Social Media Platforms: Evidence from Facebook Pages
Li, R., & Suh, A. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.146 · Cited by 225
“While some researchers have addressed issues related to the information credibility on social media, they mainly focused on a specific type of social media platforms, such as blogs or Twitter.”
MethodShen, C., Kasra, M., Pan, W., Bassett, G. A., Malloch, Y., & O’Brien, J. F. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818799526 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Westerman, D., Spence, P. R., & Van Der Heide, B.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 199-206
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027968480
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 62.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A social network as information: The effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.001
- The paper
- Westerman, D., Spence, P. R., & Van Der Heide, B. (2012). A social network as information: The effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
