Loneliness, anxiousness, and substance use as predictors of Facebook use
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies of SNSs use have focused primarily on younger samples, leaving a gap in knowledge about how antecedents of excessive use and addiction differ between adolescents and adults.
“This is one of the gaps in existing literature, where many of the studies on SNSs use focused primarily on younger samples (Clayton et al., 2013;Ross et al., 2009).”
From Till logout do us part? Comparison of factors predicting excessive social network sites use and addiction between Singaporean adolescents and adults (2017) · cites this paper as Clayton et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 143
- Authors
- Clayton, R. B., Osborne, R. E., Miller, B. K., & Oberle, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Texas State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clayton, Russell B.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 687-693
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123972743
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 47.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- loneliness, anxiety, alcohol consumption, cannabis use, Facebook use, social network sites, university students, emotional connection, social connectedness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
