Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Braun [41] found that frequency of Internet use, perceived usefulness and trust in SNSs could significantly predict intention to use SNSs among older adults.
“For example, Braun [41] examined which factors fostered or hampered older adults’ intention and motivation to use SNSs and found that frequency of Internet use, perceived usefulness and trust in SNSs could significantly predict intention to use SNSs.”
From Determinants of user acceptance of a specific social platform for older adults: An empirical examination of user interface characteristics and behavioral intention (2017) · cites this paper as Braun [41]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 337
- Authors
- Braun, M. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Braun, Michael T.
- ORCID
- Braun, Michael T.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 673-680
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011241231
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 82.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- social networking sites, older adults, technology adoption, technology acceptance model, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, trust in social media, social pressure, internet use frequency, Facebook, intergenerational communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
