Theory of reasoned action application for green information technology acceptance
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GIT acceptance was measured using four items from Mishra et al. (2014) because it is the most suitable scale based on Watson et al.'s definition.
“We measure GIT acceptance using four items from Mishra et al. (2014) because it is the most suitable scale based on the definition of Watson et al. (2008): ' Green IT is all about transmitting, processing or storing information. '”
From Sustainable entrepreneurship and knowledge management: Role of green information technology in building sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems (2025) · cites this paper as Mishra et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 113 · Cited by 275
- Authors
- Mishra, D., Akman, I., & Mishra, A.
- Affiliations
- Atilim University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Mishra, Deepti
- Mishra, Alok
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 29-40
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970521507
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Keywords
- green computing, technology adoption, theory of reasoned action, behavioral intention, attitudes, IT professionals, environmental awareness, carbon footprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
