Cited by 1,421Teaching and Learning ProgrammingDesign Education and PracticeGender and Technology in Education

Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12?

Lye, Sze Yee, Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling·2014·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Lye, Sze Yee
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
41
Pages
51-61
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970953601
Cited by
1,421
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 137 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 159 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 183 · 2020: 154 · 2019: 148 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 18
FWCI
53.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
computational thinking, programming education, K-12 education, computational practice, computational concepts, abstraction, decomposition, think-aloud, constructionism, scaffolding, reflection, intervention research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review