CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 43Technology Adoption and User BehaviourDecision Support System ApplicationsInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

The moderating roles of subjective (perceived) and objective task complexity in system use and performance

Chan, Siew H., Song, Qian, Yao, Lee J.·2015·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.059
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.059

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 43

Authors
Chan, S. H., Song, Q., & Yao, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Chan, Siew H.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
51
Pages
393-402
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.059
OpenAlex
W747268220
Cited by
43
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
decision support system, task complexity, task motivation, system performance, moderating effect, cognitive resources, information processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review