The impact of paper-based, computer-based and mobile-based self-assessment on students' science motivation and achievement
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Self-assessment improves student's motivation, engagement, and outcomes in computer-based, mobile-based, pen-paper based, and e-learning-based education environments.
“However, there are a significant number of studies giving proof that uncovers and reveals that self-assessment improves student's motivation, engagement, their outcomes in computer-based, mobilebased, pen-paper based, and e-learning-based education environment [49,50].”
From Artificial Intelligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Education (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 153
- Authors
- Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Macedonia (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Nikou, Stavros A.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 55
- Pages
- 1241-1248
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2207960981
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 38.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Keywords
- self-assessment, science motivation, physics education, assessment mode, computer-based testing, mobile-based assessment, paper-based assessment, academic performance, low-achieving students, high school students, student motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
