Cited by 106Impact of Technology on AdolescentsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsChild Development and Digital Technology

Parent marital conflict and Internet addiction among Chinese college students: The mediating role of father-child, mother-child, and peer attachment

Yang, Xiaojun, Zhu, Lei, Chen, Qin, Song, Pingping, Wang, Zhenhong·2016·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.041

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 106

Authors
Yang, X., Zhu, L., Chen, Q., Song, P., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Zhenhong
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
59
Pages
221-229
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2284577151
Cited by
106
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5
FWCI
31.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Social Science Foundation (BBA090030)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
internet addiction, parent-child attachment, maternal attachment, peer attachment, university students, mediation, Chinese youth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review