Exploring students’ purposes of usage and educational usage of Facebook
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Facebook is used to keep up with close and distant friends, for informational and educational gratifications, passing time, and self-promotion.
“Similar to Snapchat, Facebook has also been found to keep up with close and distant friends, for informational and educational gratifications, passing time, and for self-promotion (Manasijević et al. 2016;Sendurur et al. 2015).”
From Uses and Gratifications of Problematic Social Media Use Among University Students: a Simultaneous Examination of the Big Five of Personality Traits, Social Media Platforms, and Social Media Use Motives (2020) · cites this paper as Manasijević et al. 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Manasijević, D., Živković, D., Arsić, S., & Milošević, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Belgrade (RS)
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 60
- Pages
- 441-450
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2289793522
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 24.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Keywords
- Facebook, social media in education, university students, student attitudes, interpersonal relationships, work activities, daily activities, collaboration, academic groups, communication, resource sharing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
