Social media ostracism: The effects of being excluded online
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies with college students and older adults found that receiving few likes created short-term threats to needs to belonging, control, and self-esteem relative to the many likes condition.
“Previous studies with college students and older adults found that this manipulation (e.g., receiving few likes) created short-term threats to needs to belonging, control, and self-esteem relative to many likes condition (Schneider et al., 2017; Wolf et al., 2015).”
From Getting Fewer “Likes” Than Others on Social Media Elicits Emotional Distress Among Victimized Adolescents (2020) · cites this paper as Schneider et al., 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 173
- Authors
- Schneider, F. M., Zwillich, B., Bindl, M. J., Hopp, F. R., Reich, S., & Vorderer, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Mannheim (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schneider, Frank M.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 73
- Pages
- 385-393
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2600607929
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- MADOC (University of Mannheim) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Keywords
- digital exclusion, need satisfaction, sense of belonging, self-esteem, meaningful life, perceived control, negative emotions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
