Predicting the acceptance and use of information and communication technology by older adults: An empirical examination of the revised UTAUT2
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Macedo (2017) reports strong effects of performance expectancy on behavioral intention.
“Macedo (2017) also reports strong effects of PE on BI.”
From Understanding the determinants of novel technology adoption among teachers: the case of 3D printing (2020) · cites this paper as Macedo (2017)
Macedo (2017) demonstrates that for older adults, facilitating conditions are the second most important predictor of behavioral intention, behind performance expectancy.
“Macedo (2017) even demonstrates that for older adults, FC are the second most important predictor of BI, behind PE.”
From Understanding the determinants of novel technology adoption among teachers: the case of 3D printing (2020) · cites this paper as Macedo (2017)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 98 · Cited by 402
- Authors
- Macedo, I. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Minho (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Macedo, Isabel Maria
- ORCID
- Macedo, Isabel Maria
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 75
- Pages
- 935-948
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2623089729
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 63.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- UTAUT2, technology acceptance, older adults, ICT use, behavioral intention, intention to use technology, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation, habit, population aging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
