Cited by 85Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

The smartphone as your follower: the role of smartphone literacy in the relation between privacy concerns, attitude and behaviour towards phone-embedded tracking

Ketelaar, Paul E., van Balen, Mark·2018·Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract

Previous research on the collection of personal information in order to make tailor made advertising and services possible shows that the more overt the collection is, the more users will resist and try to avoid it. However, this research has always focussed on third parties, like apps and websites, collecting this information, while the smartphones on which these third parties operate also collect information. Based on the Psychological Ownership Theory and the Diffusion of Innovations Theory a survey (N = 924) has shown that the more privacy concerns users experience , the more negative their attitudes are towards the collection of location data by their smartphones, and that they adjust the settings of their smartphones in order to prevent being tracked. Users' earlier position on the adoption curve, and with that their smartphone literacy, decreases the strength of the connection between privacy concerns and attitude. It is important for the companies that are responsible for location tracking to help users feeling in control and to acknowledge that people own their data, not the companies who bought their data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.034

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smartphone literacy is a type of privacy literacy that includes, among others, knowledge about the type of data needed for an app to function.

    “Smartphone literacy is a type of privacy literacy that includes, among others, knowledge about the type of data needed for an app to function (Ketelaar and van Balen, 2018).”

    From The privacy and control paradoxes in the context of smartphone apps (2022) · cites this paper as Ketelaar and van Balen, 2018

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 85

Authors
Ketelaar, P. E., & van Balen, M.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Ketelaar, Paul E.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
78
Pages
174-182
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2757205367
Cited by
85
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5
FWCI
16.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
privacy concerns, location tracking, smartphone location data, attitude-behavior relationship, diffusion of innovations, adoption curve, privacy settings, personal data ownership, user control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review