Personality and problematic smartphone use: A facet-level analysis using the five factor model and HEXACO frameworks
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The main factor explaining smartphone use within the social performance category was the personality characteristics of individuals.
“The main factor explaining smartphone use within the social performance category was the personality characteristics of individuals (Horwood & Anglim, 2018;Lapointe et al., 2013;Panda & Jain, 2018)”
From Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: A systematic literature review of an emerging research area (2021) · cites this paper as Horwood & Anglim, 2018
Studies using the big five personality traits or Five-Factor Model suggest a positive relationship between extraversion and an individual's levels of smartphone usage, as extraverts are more likely to use their smartphone to socialize.
“studies employing the”
From Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: A systematic literature review of an emerging research area (2021) · cites this paper as Horwood & Anglim, 2018
Individuals with the trait of neuroticism may develop an excessive dependence on the smartphone due to social anxiety and their need to constantly seek reassurance from peers through smartphone mediated communication.
“Individuals with the trait of neuroticism may also develop an excessive dependence on the smartphone due to social anxiety and their need to constantly seek reassurance from peers through smartphone mediated communication (Horwood & Anglim, 2018;Li & Lin, 2019).”
From Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: A systematic literature review of an emerging research area (2021) · cites this paper as Horwood & Anglim, 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 163
- Authors
- Horwood, S., & Anglim, J.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Horwood, Sharon
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 349-359
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2796617457
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 29.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- smartphone addiction, personality traits, Big Five personality traits, HEXACO, neuroticism, conscientiousness, impulsivity, vulnerability, anxiety, honesty-humility, agreeableness, emotionality, compulsive smartphone use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
