Self-efficacy and acceptance of robots
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most conceptualisations of AI literacy do not explicitly mention the development of AI.
“This is in line with most conceptualisations of AI literacy where the development of AI is not explicitly mentioned [13, 23, 29]”
This is in line with the conceptualisation by Long and Magerko, who included the ability to recognize AI in their framework.
“This is in line with the conceptualisation by Long and Magerko [29], who included the ability to recognize AI in their framework.”
Create AI is separate and no part of AI Literacy.
“This fits in with the general picture that Create AI is separate [13, 23, 29] and no part of AI Literacy.”
Cites
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664 · see citing works
A survey of socially interactive robots
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00372-x · Cited by 3,162 · see citing works
Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2006) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333 · Cited by 2,113 · see citing works
Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.011 · Cited by 1,218 · see citing works
Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley
Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007 · Cited by 941 · see citing works
Kätsyri, J., Förger, K., Mäkäräinen, M., & Takala, T. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00390 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Flandorfer, P. (2012) · International Journal of Population Research · doi:10.1155/2012/829835 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carolus, A., Koch, M. J., Straka, S., Latoschik, M. E., & Wienrich, C. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100014 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
Chi, O. H., Denton, G., & Gursoy, D. (2020) · Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management · doi:10.1080/19368623.2020.1721394 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Too Late to be Creative? AI-Empowered Tools in Creative Processes
Hwang, A. H.-C. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts · doi:10.1145/3491101.3503549 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Determinants and Barriers of Artificial Intelligence Adoption – A Literature Review
Radhakrishnan, J., & Chattopadhyay, M. (2020) · IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64849-7_9 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Shao, C., Nah, S., Makady, H., & McNealy, J. (2024) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2331858 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
- Authors
- Latikka, R., Turja, T., & Oksanen, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Tampere (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Oksanen, Atte
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 93
- Pages
- 157-163
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904425693
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 13.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Academy of Finland's Strategic Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Keywords
- robot acceptance, general self-efficacy, care robots, assistive robots, humanoid robots, pet robots, telepresence robots, technology acceptance, aging society, welfare services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
