Cited by 162Impact of Technology on AdolescentsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourTechnostress in Professional Settings

Too much overload and concerns: Antecedents of social media fatigue and the mediating role of emotional exhaustion

Sheng, Nan, Yang, Chunjiang, Han, Lei, Jou, Min·2023·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107500

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 76 · Cited by 162

Authors
Sheng, N., Yang, C., Han, L., & Jou, M.
Affiliations
  • Jinan University (CN)
  • Northwest University (CN)
  • Shandong Normal University (CN)
  • National Taiwan Normal University (TW)
Corresponding author
  • Yang, Chunjiang
  • Jou, Min
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
139
Pages
107500
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297373442
Cited by
162
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 20
FWCI
41.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (72172137)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
Keywords
social media fatigue, emotional exhaustion, information overload, privacy violations, mediating effect, user experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review