Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Copper isotope ratios in magmatic and hydrothermal ore-forming environments

Open access
Larson, Peter B, Maher, Kierran, Ramos, Frank C, Chang, Zhaoshan, Gaspar, Miguel, Meinert, Lawrence D·2003·Chemical Geology

Abstract

Multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry now provides for precise and accurate measurements of Cu isotope ratios. Copper minerals prepared by direct dissolution with and without chromatographic purification yield identical Cu isotope ratios within analytic precision of about 0.04x(1r). Cu isotope ratios have been measured for copper minerals from worldwide magmatic and hydrothermal copper deposits, and for several weathered deposits. Natural variations in d65Cu values, relative to NBS976, range over 9x. Chalcopyrite samples from mafic intrusions lie within a narrow range of about 1.5x, and most cluster tightly between 0.10xand 0.20x. This range lies within the broader black smoker chalcopyrite and iron meteorite ranges, and possibly represents a bulk mantle Cu isotope ratio. Most values for hydrothermal native copper from the Michigan native copper district also show a narrow range just larger than 0.1xand suggest a common homogeneous source for Cu in this large hydrothermal system. Later copper sulfide and arsenide minerals from this district range to values more than 2x lower than native copper. Ratios for chalcopyrite and bornite from moderate to high-temperature porphyry, skarn, and replacement deposits as a group and within individual deposits exhibit a broad range of values. Variations of nearly 1xare observed over distances on the order of 1 m. In some cases, these variations may result from multiple mineralization events or copper remobilization during retrograde or later hydrothermal activity. Fractionations between chalcopyrite and bornite, where they occur in the same sample or in related samples, cluster near 0.4x, suggesting equilibrium Cu isotope fractionation between them at moderate temperatures. In addition, weathering of hydrothermal copper minerals produces a wide range of values in secondary copper phases. In the supergene environment, cuprite typically has higher values than associated native copper. Therefore, redox states appear to exert a significant control over fractionation at low temperatures. Significant questions remain to be answered. Before the source of copper in hydrothermal environments can be fully addressed, source reservoir Cu ratios need to be determined, and chemical and physical factors that control Cu isotope fractionation must be quantitatively defined. D 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2003.08.006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Larson, P. B., Maher, K., Ramos, F. C., Chang, Z., Gaspar, M., & Meinert, L. D.
Venue
Chemical Geology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
201
Issue
3-4
Pages
337-350
ISSN
0009-2541 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023556842
Cited by
245
References
2
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Copper isotope ratios in magmatic and hydrothermal ore-forming environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2003.08.006
The paper
Larson, P. B., Maher, K., Ramos, F. C., Chang, Z., Gaspar, M., & Meinert, L. D. (2003). Copper isotope ratios in magmatic and hydrothermal ore-forming environments. Chemical Geology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2003.08.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.