The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental study of monazite/melt partitioning with implications for the REE, Th and U geochemistry of crustal rocks
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We report the results of monazite/melt partitioning experiments conducted in the piston-cylinder apparatus at 10–50 kbar and 750–1200 °C, using a synthetic granite mix with approximately 10 wt.% H2O and doped with trace-elements in proportions corresponding to the composition of monazite. Monazite was produced in all experiments, generally in the form of small grains. Electron microprobe and laser ablation-ICP-MS analyses were carried out on the resulting “monazite–melt” mixes from these experiments, and the composition of the crystallized monazite calculated using regression analysis. The concentrations of LREE and Th in the melts coexisting with monazite increase sharply with increasing temperature. Monazite solubility decreases by 35–40% as pressure increase from 10 to 30 kbar. Monazite solubility in granitic melts with an Alumina Saturation Index above 0.85 and FeO + CaO + MgO l n ∑ L R E E = 16.16 ( ± 0.3 ) + 0.23 ( ± 0.07 ) H 2 O − 11494 ( ± 410 ) / T − 19.4 ( ± 4 ) P / T + l n X mnz LREE Where H2O is in weight percent, T is in Kelvin, P in kbar and ∑ LREE is the sum of La–Sm in ppm; XmnzLREE is the molar ratio of LREE to the sum of all cations (REE, Th, U) in monazite. REE, Th, U, Y, V and As partition into monazite, whereas other trace elements (Li, Be, B, Sc, Ti, Mn, Sr, Zr, Nb, Ba, Hf, Ta and Pb) have monazite/melt partition coefficients less than unity. Monazite shows the greatest preference for LREE from La to Nd, with a progressive decrease in partition coefficients for Sm and the HREE. The partition coefficients for Th are 30% higher than those for the LREE, and Th/LREE ratios are independent of pressure and temperature. Partition coefficients for U are 4–23 times lower than for the LREE. The new experimental data provide a numerical basis for modeling the behavior of LREE, Th and U during fractional crystallization of granitic magmas, as well as the melting in the presence of monazite, both within the continental crust, and in subduction zones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shannon, R. D. (1976) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739476001551 · Cited by 66,145
The chemical composition of subducting sediment and its consequences for the crust and mantle
Plank, T., & Langmuir, C. H. (1998) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(97)00150-2 · Cited by 3,499
Emerging geothermometers for estimating slab surface temperatures
Plank, T., Cooper, L. B., & Manning, C. E. (2009) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo614 · Cited by 224
Cited by
Ce and Eu anomalies in zircon as proxies for the oxidation state of magmas
Trail, D., Bruce Watson, E., & Tailby, N. D. (2012) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2012.08.032 · Cited by 787
Kelsey, D. E., & Hand, M. (2015) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2014.09.006 · Cited by 441
Williams, M. L., Grover, T., Jercinovic, M. J., Regan, S. P., Pless, C. R., & Suarez, K. A. (2019) · American Mineralogist · doi:10.2138/am-2019-6906 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Stepanov, A. S., Hermann, J., Rubatto, D., & Rapp, R. P.
- Venue
- Chemical Geology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 300-301
- Pages
- 200-220
- ISSN
- 0009-2541 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049306346
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental study of monazite/melt partitioning with implications for the REE, Th and U geochemistry of crustal rocks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.01.007
- The paper
- Stepanov, A. S., Hermann, J., Rubatto, D., & Rapp, R. P. (2012). Experimental study of monazite/melt partitioning with implications for the REE, Th and U geochemistry of crustal rocks. Chemical Geology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.01.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.