Reaction path modeling of enhanced in situ CO2 mineralization for carbon sequestration in the peridotite of the Samail Ophiolite, Sultanate of Oman
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The weight of CO2 sequestered per kilogram of peridotite could be 350× higher with injection at depth.
“and the weight of CO 2 sequestered per kilogram of peridotite could be 350× higher (Paukert et al., 2012).”
From An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations (2019) · cites this paper as Paukert et al., 2012
When alkaline waters emerge at springs on the surface, they combine with atmospheric CO2 to form calcite travertine deposits.
“When these alkaline waters emerge at springs on the surface, they combine with atmospheric CO 2 to form calcite (CaCO 3 ) travertine deposits”
From An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations (2019) · cites this paper as Paukert et al., 2012
Injecting CO2 at depth in peridotite formations could increase the mineralization rate by 16,000× over natural systems.
“Modeling has shown that injecting CO 2 at depth in peridotite formations could increase the mineralization rate by 16,000× over natural systems”
From An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations (2019) · cites this paper as Paukert et al., 2012
The resulting enhancement of the carbonation rate following the proposed in situ mineralization process is considered to be one million times faster than the natural process pace.
“The resulting enhancement of the carbonation rate following this process is considered to be one million times faster than the natural process pace.32, 33”
From A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub> (2014) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 179
- Authors
- Paukert, A. N., Matter, J. M., Kelemen, P. B., Shock, E. L., & Havig, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Paukert, Amelia N.
- Venue
- Chemical Geology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 330-331
- Pages
- 86-100
- ISSN
- 0009-2541 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978277543
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemical Geology (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Keywords
- CO2 mineralization, carbon sequestration, peridotite, Samail ophiolite, reaction path modeling, CO2 injection, mantle peridotite, dissolution kinetics, dissolved inorganic carbon, mineralization efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
