Cited by 28Statistical and numerical algorithmsAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsStatistical Methods and Applications

Omnivariant Generalized Least Squares regression: Theory, geochronological applications, and making the case for reconciled Δ47 calibrations

Open access
Daëron, M., Vermeesch, P.·2024·Chemical Geology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Least-squares regression methods are mathematically powerful, conceptually and computationally simple, and widely used in many fields. However, none of the commonly-used flavors of least-squares regression, such as York regression or Generalized Least Squares (GLS), take into account the full set of covariances between all observed (x,y) values. Here we describe the Omnivariant Generalized Least Squares (OGLS) method to fit a model of the form y=f(x), accounting for the full error correlation structure of the (x,y) data, based on a first-order linear propagation of the uncertainties in all variables into errors in y residuals, followed by minimizing the vector of y residuals with respect to the Mahalanobis norm defined by its covariance matrix. This approach may be described as a generalization of both York regression and GLS. It is mathematically exact for straight-line fits, and is also suitable for many non-linear models. Here we describe the principles of OGLS regression and discuss its properties, caveats, and practical use, and provide two consistent open-source implementations in Python and R. To illustrate how various fields of geochronology and stable-isotope geochemistry may benefit from this new method, we discuss how OGLS may specifically apply to 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dating and how it provides robust mathematical evidence that Δ 47 carbonate calibrations in the recently defined I-CDES metrological scale are statistically indistinguishable, effectively solving long-standing methodological discrepancies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2023.121881

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 28

Authors
Daëron, M., & Vermeesch, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Daëron, M.
Venue
Chemical Geology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
647
Pages
121881
ISSN
0009-2541 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389914693
Cited by
28
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
12.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Geology (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (/T001518/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
error propagation, 40Ar/39Ar dating, stable isotope geochemistry, geochronology, nonlinear regression, covariance structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review