CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of pore scale NAPL morphology in homogeneous sands as a function of grain size and NAPL dissolution

Cho, Jaehyun, Annable, Michael D.·2005·Chemosphere
DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.042
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this study, we investigate pore scale morphology of nonaqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) trapped in different pore sizes using tracer techniques. Specific interfacial area and saturation of NAPL trapped in homogeneous sands were measured using the interfacial and partitioning tracer techniques. The observed NAPL-water interfacial areas increased in a log-linear fashion with decreasing sand grain size, but showed no clear trend with residual NAPL saturation formed in the various grain sizes. The measured values were used to calculate the NAPL morphology index, which characterizes the spatial NAPL distribution within the pore space. The NAPL morphology indices, increased exponentially with decreasing grain size, indicating that the NAPL becomes smaller, but more blobs. For a fixed grain size, the specific interfacial area and saturation of the NAPL were measured following changes caused by dissolution using alcohol. The observed interfacial areas showed a decrease linearly as a function of the NAPL saturation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.042

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fluid-fluid interfacial area is a function of soil properties such as grain size, grain-size distribution, and surface roughness.

    “Research has also demonstrated that fluid-fluid interfacial area is a function of soil properties such as grain size, grain-size distribution, and surface roughness (Anwar et al., 2000; Cho and Annable, 2005; Dobson et al., 2006; Brusseau et al., 2008, 2009, 2010; Peng and Brusseau, 2005).”

    From Assessing the potential contributions of additional retention processes to PFAS retardation in the subsurface (2018) · cites this paper as Cho and Annable, 2005

  • Data on surfactant adsorption to NAPL-water interfaces have been used to determine the impact of soil properties such as grain size on interfacial adsorption.

    “These data have been used to determine the impact of soil properties such as grain size on interfacial adsorption (Cho and Annable, 2005; Dobson et al., 2006; Brusseau et al., 2009, 2010).”

    From Assessing the potential contributions of additional retention processes to PFAS retardation in the subsurface (2018) · cites this paper as Cho and Annable, 2005

  • Adsorption of surfactants to NAPL-water interfaces has been measured for a variety of porous media.

    “Adsorption of surfactants to NAPL-water interfaces has been measured for a variety of porous media (Saripalli et al., 1998; Cho and Annable, 2005; Dobson et al., 2006; Brusseau et al., 2008, 2009, 2010; Narter and Brusseau, 2010; McDonald et al., 2016; Zhong et al., 2016).”

    From Assessing the potential contributions of additional retention processes to PFAS retardation in the subsurface (2018) · cites this paper as Cho and Annable, 2005

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Annable, M.D., Rao, P.S.C., Hatfield, K., Graham, W.D., Wood, A.L., 1995. Use of partitioning tracer for measuring residual NAPL distribution in a contaminated aquifer: Preliminary results from a field-scale test. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Tracers Workshop, The University of Texas at Austin, TX.
  2. Annable, 1998, Field evaluation of interfacial and partitioning tracers for characterization of effective NAPL–water contact areas, Ground Water, 36, 495, 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02821.x · DOI
  3. Annable, 1998, Partitioning tracers for measuring residual NAPL: Field-scale test results, J. Environ. Eng., 124, 498, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1998)124:6(498) · DOI
  4. Bradford, 1997, Estimating interfacial areas for multi-fluid soil systems, J. Contam. Hydrol., 27, 83, 10.1016/S0169-7722(96)00048-4 · DOI
  5. Cary, 1994, Estimating the surface area of fluids phase interfaces in porous media, J. Contam. Hydrol., 15, 243, 10.1016/0169-7722(94)90029-9 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chatzis, 1983, Magnitude and detailed structure of residual oil saturation, SPEJ Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 23, 311, 10.2118/10681-PA · DOI
  7. Gvirtzman, 1991, Pore scale spatial analysis of two immiscible fluids in porous media, Water Resour. Res., 27, 1165, 10.1029/91WR00303 · DOI
  8. Jin, 1995, Partitioning tracer test for detection, estimation, and remediation performance assessment of subsurface nonaqueous phase liquids, Water Resour. Res., 31, 1202, 10.1029/95WR00174 · DOI
  9. Leverett, 1941, Capillary behavior in porous solids, Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng., 142, 152
  10. Meinardus, 2002, Performance assessment of NAPL remediation in heterogeneous alluvium, J. Contam. Hydrol., 54, 173, 10.1016/S0169-7722(01)00161-9 · DOI
  11. Pope, G.A., Jin, M., Dwarakanath, V., Rouse, B., Sepehrnoori, K., 1995. Partitioning tracer tests to characterize organic contaminants. In: 2nd Tracer Workshop. University of Texas at Austin, TX.
  12. Rao, 1997, Field-scale evaluation of in situ cosolvent flushing for enhanced aquifer remediation, Water Resour. Res., 33, 2673, 10.1029/97WR02145 · DOI
  13. Rao, P.S.C., Kim, H., Annable, M.D. 2002. Air–water interfacial area. In: Dane, J.H., Topp, G.C. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, second ed., Section 3.3.6. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI, pp. 783–796.
  14. Saripalli, K.P., 1996. Use of Interfacial Tracers for Characterization of Nonaqueous Phase Liquid (NAPL) Distribution in Porous Media. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida.
  15. Saripalli, 1997, Measurement of specific fluid–fluid interfacial areas of immiscible fluids in porous media, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 932, 10.1021/es960652g · DOI
  16. Saripalli, 1998, Determination of specific areas of residual NAPLs in porous media using the interfacial tracers technique, J. Contam. Hydrol., 30, 375, 10.1016/S0169-7722(97)00052-1 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Wu, 2000, Using partitioning alcohol tracers to estimate hydrophobicity of high molecular weight LNAPLs, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 4701, 10.1021/es991336f · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cho, J., & Annable, M. D.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
61
Issue
7
Pages
899-908
ISSN
0045-6535
DOI
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.042
Cited by
37
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review