Perfluorinated compounds in urban river sediments from Guangzhou and Shanghai of China
Abstract
Perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) have been determined in various matrices within China including water bodies, precipitations, biota and non-occupationally PFCs-exposed populations in recent years, yet little attention has been focused on the distributions of PFCs in urban river sediments from Chinese major metropolises such as Guangzhou and Shanghai so far. In this study, sediment samples of 0-2 cm were collected from 13 sites in the Zhujiang River across Guangzhou and nine sites in the Huangpu River across Shanghai. PFCs analysis on these sediments via high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) system was implemented targeting eight analytes involving perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS), perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) and perfluorotetradecanoic acid (PFTA). According to the analytical results, total concentrations of PFCs ([summation operator]PFCs) in sediments from the Zhujiang River were between 0.09 and 3.6 ng/g dry weight (dw), with PFOS being the dominant PFC contaminant in the river ranged from below LOD to 3.1 ng/g dw; while [summation operator]PFCs in sediments from the Huangpu River were between 0.25 and 1.1 ng/g dw, with PFOA being the main PFC contaminant in the river determined in the levels of 0.20-0.64 ng/g dw. Additionally, an overall decreasing trend of PFCs contaminations with depth was observed in both of two 60 cm sediment cores from the Zhujiang River and the Huangpu River each.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PFOA was the highest contributor in sediment.
“which reported that PFOA was the highest contributor in sediment”
From Short- and long-chain perfluoroalkyl substances in the water, suspended particulate matter, and surface sediment of a turbid river (2016) · cites this paper as Bao et al., 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 136
- Authors
- Bao, J., Liu, W., Liu, L., Jin, Y., Ran, X., & Zhang, Z.
- Affiliations
- Dalian University of Technology (CN)
- China Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Jin, Yihe
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-130
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062608505
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
- Keywords
- perfluorinated compounds, river sediments, urban river pollution, Zhujiang River, Huangpu River, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorinated carboxylic acids, perfluorinated sulfonates, sediment core, depth distribution, Guangzhou, Shanghai
- MeSH terms
- Caprylates, China, Cities, Decanoic Acids, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Lauric Acids, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Geologic Sediments, Rivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review