A Comparative Study on Sorption of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) by Chars, Ash and Carbon Nanotubes
Abstract
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), as one of emerging contaminants, has been attracting increasing concerns in recent years. Sorption of PFOS by maize straw- and willow-derived chars (M400 and W400), maize straw-origin ash (MA) as well as three carbon nanotubes (CNTs) was studied in this work. The sorption kinetics of PFOS by the six adsorbents was well fitted by the pseudo-second-order model. CNTs reached equilibrium in 2h, much faster than those by chars (384 h) and ash (48 h). According to the sorption isotherms, both single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) and MA had high sorption capacities (over 700 mg g(-1)), while the two chars had low sorption capacities (below 170 mg g(-1)) caused by their small BET surface area. In the case of MA, due to its positively charged surface, both hydrophobic interaction and electrostatic attraction involved in the sorption, and the formation of hemi-micelles further favored the sorption. This study suggested that SWCNT and MA were effective adsorbents for PFOS removal from water. Compared to SWCNT, MA is low cost and easy to obtain, so it could be a preferred adsorbent for PFOS removal.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An in vitro study demonstrated that SWCNT had high sorption capacity for PFOS.
“This finding agreed with an in vitro study, which demonstrated that SWCNT had high sorption capacity for PFOS (Chen et al., 2011).”
From A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances on the Brain and Behavior (2022) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 247
- Authors
- Chen, X., Xia, X., Wang, X., Qiao, J., & Chen, H.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- Peking University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xia, Xinghui
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1313-1319
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032387863
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Keywords
- PFOS, adsorption, carbon nanotubes, single-walled carbon nanotubes, biomass char, ash, sorption kinetics, pseudo-second-order kinetics, sorption isotherms, electrostatic attraction, hydrophobic interactions, emerging contaminants, water treatment, low-cost adsorbent
- MeSH terms
- Adsorption, Charcoal, Fluorocarbons, Kinetics, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Water Purification, Nanotubes, Carbon
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review