Cited by 247Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

A Comparative Study on Sorption of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) by Chars, Ash and Carbon Nanotubes

Chen, Xi, Xia, Xinghui, Wang, Xilong, Qiao, Jinping, Chen, Huiting·2011·Chemosphere

Abstract

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), as one of emerging contaminants, has been attracting increasing concerns in recent years. Sorption of PFOS by maize straw- and willow-derived chars (M400 and W400), maize straw-origin ash (MA) as well as three carbon nanotubes (CNTs) was studied in this work. The sorption kinetics of PFOS by the six adsorbents was well fitted by the pseudo-second-order model. CNTs reached equilibrium in 2h, much faster than those by chars (384 h) and ash (48 h). According to the sorption isotherms, both single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) and MA had high sorption capacities (over 700 mg g(-1)), while the two chars had low sorption capacities (below 170 mg g(-1)) caused by their small BET surface area. In the case of MA, due to its positively charged surface, both hydrophobic interaction and electrostatic attraction involved in the sorption, and the formation of hemi-micelles further favored the sorption. This study suggested that SWCNT and MA were effective adsorbents for PFOS removal from water. Compared to SWCNT, MA is low cost and easy to obtain, so it could be a preferred adsorbent for PFOS removal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 247

Authors
Chen, X., Xia, X., Wang, X., Qiao, J., & Chen, H.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xia, Xinghui
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
83
Issue
10
Pages
1313-1319
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032387863
Cited by
247
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
PFOS, adsorption, carbon nanotubes, single-walled carbon nanotubes, biomass char, ash, sorption kinetics, pseudo-second-order kinetics, sorption isotherms, electrostatic attraction, hydrophobic interactions, emerging contaminants, water treatment, low-cost adsorbent
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Charcoal, Fluorocarbons, Kinetics, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Water Purification, Nanotubes, Carbon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review