Cited by 195Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluoride Effects and RemovalPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

Behavior of perfluorinated compounds in soils during leaching experiments

Gellrich, V., Stahl, T., Knepper, T.P.·2012·Chemosphere

Abstract

Perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) can be detected worldwide in both, soil and water. In order to study the leaching behavior of this heterogeneous group of compounds in soil, flow-through column experiments have been conducted. Ten perfluoro carboxylates and four perfluoro sulfonates ranging from C4 to C14 in chain length, and contaminated sewage sludge, have been used to spike a standard soil. The aqueous column effluent was analyzed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with direct injection. The observed percolation velocity seems to be strongly correlated with the length of the perfluorinated chain. Other factors that additionally contribute to the leaching behavior are the functional group of the PFC, the organic carbon content of the soil and the presence of other adsorbates. A mass balance calculation showed that perfluorobutanoic acid can adsorb strongly to the soil, when no PFC with longer carbon chain are present. Only about 60% of the added perfluorobutanoic acid could be detected in the percolate water. The missing amount started to elute again when longer chain PFC or stearate were added to the soil. Thus it would appear that larger and more lipophilic molecules can displace shorter PFC from their binding sites in the soil. The results of a monitoring study using 32 surface water samples and 150 groundwater samples confirm that the PFC with the highest concentrations in groundwater are the short chain PFC with less than 7 (fluorinated) carbon atoms. The dominating PFC in surface waters are perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.02.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 195

Authors
Gellrich, V., Stahl, T., & Knepper, T. P.
Affiliations
Hochschule Fresenius (DE)
Corresponding author
Knepper, T.P.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
87
Issue
9
Pages
1052-1056
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979205931
Cited by
195
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, perfluorocarboxylic acids, perfluorosulfonic acid, perfluorobutanoic acid, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, soil leaching, flow-through column experiments, adsorption, chain length effects, lipophilicity, competitive adsorption, groundwater contamination, surface water contamination, mass balance
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Liquid, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated, Sewage, Soil Pollutants, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Groundwater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review