Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 116

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Citric acid-assisted phytoextraction of lead: A field experiment

Freitas, Eriberto Vagner, Nascimento, Clístenes Williams, Souza, Adailson, Silva, Fernando Bruno·2013·Chemosphere

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.103

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Araújo, 2010, Phytoextraction of lead from soil from a battery recycling site: the use of citric acid and NTA, Water Air Soil Pollut., 211, 113, 10.1007/s11270-009-0285-4 · DOI
  2. Fellet, 2007, The application of phytoremediation technology in a soil contaminated by pyrite cinders, Ecol. Eng., 31, 207, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.06.011 · DOI
  3. Freitas, 2009, Citric acid enhances lead phytoextraction from a soil contaminated by automotive batteries, Rev. Bras. Ci. Solo, 33, 467, 10.1590/S0100-06832009000200024 · DOI
  4. Meers, 2010, The use of bio-energy crops (Zea mays) for ‘phytoattenuation’ of heavy metals on moderately contaminated soils: a field experiment, Chemosphere, 78, 35, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.08.015 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Melo, 2008, Phytoextraction and fractionation of heavy metals in soil after multiple applications of natural chelants, Sci. Agric., 65, 61, 10.1590/S0103-90162008000100009 · DOI
  6. Neugschwandtner, 2008, Phytoextraction of Pb and Cd from a contaminated agricultural soil using different EDTA application regimes: laboratory versus field scale measures of efficiency, Geoderma, 144, 446, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.11.021 · DOI
  7. Novozamsky, 1993, A single extraction procedure of soil for evaluation of uptake of some heavy metals by plants, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 51, 47, 10.1080/03067319308027610 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Tian, 2004, The study on tolerance of Vetiveria zizanioides and Roegneria kamoji to heavy metal Cu, Pb, Zn and their mixed soluble, J. Biol., 21, 15
  9. Wowk, 2005, Evaluation of the lead level, in low land soil, originated from a recycling of batteries, Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient, 9, 613, 10.1590/S1415-43662005000400027 · doi:10.1590/s1415-43662005000400027
  10. Xia, 2004, Ecological rehabilitation and phytoremediation with four grasses in oil shale mined land, Chemosphere, 54, 345, 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00763-X · DOI
  11. Xu, 2009, Effects of insoluble Zn, Cd, and EDTA on the growth, activities of antioxidant enzymes and uptake of Zn and Cd in Vetiveria zizanioides, J. Environ. Sci., 21, 186, 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62249-4 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 116

Metadata

Authors
Freitas, E. V., Nascimento, C. W., Souza, A., & Silva, F. B.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
213-217
ISSN
0045-6535
Cited by
116
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Citric acid-assisted phytoextraction of lead: A field experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.103
The paper
Freitas, E. V., Nascimento, C. W., Souza, A., & Silva, F. B. (2013). Citric acid-assisted phytoextraction of lead: A field experiment. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.