Cited by 121Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Contamination profiles of perfluoroalkyl substances in five typical rivers of the Pearl River Delta region, South China

Pan, Chang-Gui, Ying, Guang-Guo, Liu, You-Sheng, Zhang, Qian-Qian, Chen, Zhi-Feng, Peng, Feng-Jiao, Huang, Guo-Yong·2014·Chemosphere

Abstract

A survey on contamination profiles of eighteen perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) was performed via high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for surface water and sediments from five typical rivers of the Pearl River Delta region, South China in summer and winter in 2012. The total concentrations of the PFASs in the water phase of the five rivers ranged from 0.14 to 346.72 ng L(-1). The PFAS concentrations in the water phase were correlated positively to some selected water quality parameters such as chemical oxygen demand (COD) (0.7913) and conductivity (0.5642). The monitoring results for the water samples showed significant seasonal variations, while those for the sediment samples showed no obvious seasonal variations. Among the selected 18 PFASs, perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) was the dominant PFAS compound both in water and sediment for two seasons with its maximum concentration of 320.5 ng L(-1) in water and 11.4 ng g(-1) dry weight (dw) in sediment, followed by perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) with its maximum concentration of 26.48 ng L(-1) in water and 0.99 ng g(-1) dw in sediment. PFOS and PFOA were found at relatively higher concentrations in the Shima River and Danshui River than in the other three rivers (Xizhijiang River, Dongjiang River and Shahe River). The principal component analysis for the PFASs concentrations in water and sediment separated the sampling sites into two groups: rural and agricultural area, and urban and industrial a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 41 · Cited by 121

Authors
Pan, C.-G., Ying, G.-G., Liu, Y.-S., Zhang, Q.-Q., Chen, Z.-F., Peng, F.-J., & Huang, G.-Y.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Ying, Guang-Guo
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
114
Pages
16-25
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021904287
Cited by
121
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation
  • National Water Pollution Control Program of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, PFAS contamination, surface water, river sediments, Pearl River Delta, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, seasonal variation, source apportionment, industrial pollution
MeSH terms
Caprylates, China, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Geologic Sediments, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review