Cited by 138Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

Invasive plant-derived biochar inhibits sulfamethazine uptake by lettuce in soil

Rajapaksha, Anushka Upamali, Vithanage, Meththika, Lim, Jung Eun, Ahmed, Mohamed Bedair M., Zhang, Ming, Lee, Sang Soo, Ok, Yong Sik·2014·Chemosphere

Abstract

Veterinary antibiotics are frequently detected in soils posing potential contamination of food crops. Sulfamethazine (SMT) uptake was investigated by lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in the soils treated with/without biochar derived from an invasive plant, burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus L.) (BBC700). Soils were contaminated with SMT at 5 and 50mgkg(-1), and treated with/without 5% BBC700 (ww(-1)). The lettuces were harvested after 5weeks of cultivation and were analyzed for SMT by a high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry after solid-phase extraction. With 5% BBC700, the uptake of SMT was reduced by 86% in the soil spiked with 5mgkg(-1) SMT compared to the control whereas a 63% reduction was observed in the soil spiked with 50mgkg(-1) SMT. Application of BBC700, into soils effectively reduced the SMT uptake by lettuce.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rajapaksha et al. (2014) biochar produced from an invasive plant at 700°C significantly reduced absorption of sulfamethazine by lettuce; compared with control, SMT absorption decreased by more than 63% after adding 5% biochar.

    “The results showed that BC can significantly reduce the absorption of SMT by lettuce (compared with the control, the SMT absorption was decreased by more than 63% after adding 5% BC).”

    From Review of organic and inorganic pollutants removal by biochar and biochar-based composites (2021) · cites this paper as Rajapaksha et al. (2014)

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 138

Authors
Rajapaksha, A. U., Vithanage, M., Lim, J. E., Ahmed, M. B. M., Zhang, M., Lee, S. S., & Ok, Y. S.
Affiliations
  • Kangwon National University (KR)
  • National Institute of Fundamental Studies (LK)
  • China Jiliang University (CN)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Ok, Yong Sik
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
111
Pages
500-504
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046538769
Cited by
138
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kangwon National University
  • Korea Basic Science Institute
  • Institute for Basic Science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Keywords
sulfamethazine, biochar, Sicyos angulatus, invasive plants, lettuce, antibiotic uptake, soil remediation, food crop contamination
MeSH terms
Anti-Infective Agents, Charcoal, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Sulfamethazine, Lactuca

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review