Cited by 210Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

Fundamental and molecular composition characteristics of biochars produced from sugarcane and rice crop residues and by-products

Jeong, Chang Yoon, Dodla, Syam K., Wang, Jim J.·2016·Chemosphere

Abstract

Biochar conversion of sugarcane and rice harvest residues provides an alternative for managing these crop residues that are traditionally burned in open field. Sugarcane leaves, bagasse, rice straw and husk were converted to biochar at four pyrolysis temperatures (PTs) of 450 °C, 550 °C, 650 °C, and 750 °C and evaluated for various elemental, molecular and surface properties. The carbon content of biochars was highest for those produced at 650-750 °C. Biochars produced at 550 °C showed the characteristics of biochar that are commonly interpreted as being stable in soil, with low H/C and O/C ratios and pyrolysis fingerprints dominated by aromatic and polyaromatic hydrocarbons. At 550 °C, all biochars also exhibited maximum CEC values with sugarcane leaves biochar (SLB) > sugarcane bagasse biochar (SBB) > rice straw biochar (RSB) > rice husk biochar (RHB). The pore size distribution of biochars was dominated by pores of 20 nm and high PT increased both smaller and larger than 50 nm pores. Water holding capacity of biochars increased with PT but the magnitude of the increase was limited by feedstock types, likely related to the hydrophobicity of biochars as evident by molecular composition, besides pore volume properties of biochars. Py-GC/MS analysis revealed a clear destruction of lignin with decarboxylation and demethoxylation at 450 °C and dehydroxylation at above 550 °C. Overall, biochar molecular compositions became similar as PT increased, and the biochars produced at 550 °C demonstrated characteristics that have potential benefit as soil amendment for improving both C sequestration and nutrient dynamics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.084

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 210

Authors
Jeong, C. Y., Dodla, S. K., & Wang, J. J.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Jim J.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
142
Pages
4-13
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W603988517
Cited by
210
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
biochar, sugarcane waste, rice residue, sugarcane bagasse, rice straw, rice husk, sugarcane leaves, pyrolysis temperature, molecular composition, lignin degradation, cation exchange capacity, pore size distribution, water holding capacity, hydrophobicity, soil amendment, carbon sequestration, crop residue management
MeSH terms
Charcoal, Oryza, Soil, Surface Properties, Temperature, Water, Saccharum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review