Bacterial reduction of highly concentrated perchlorate: Kinetics and influence of co-existing electron acceptors, temperature, pH and electron donors
Abstract
Perchlorate reduction kinetics and effects of various environmental conditions on removal of perchlorate from synthetic water were investigated to seek high-strength perchlorate removal using mixed perchlorate reducing bacteria. Results demonstrated that perchlorate (50-1500 mg L(-1)) could be degraded rapidly within 28 h under the optimal conditions. The maximum specific perchlorate reduction rate (qmax) and half saturation constant (Ks) were 0.92 mg-perchlorate (mg-dry weight)(-1) h(-1) and 157.7 mg L(-1), respectively. In the ClO4(-)-NO3(-) systems obvious but recoverable lags were caused in perchlorate reduction and the lag time increased with the ratio of nitrate to perchlorate concentration increasing from 0.5 to 3. While in the ClO4(-)-SO4(2-) systems inhibitions didn't occur until the ratio of sulfate to perchlorate concentration exceeded 10. The optimum temperature and pH value were 35 °C and 6.85, respectively. The optimal acetate-to-perchlorate ratio that could consume all perchlorate and acetate simultaneously was about 2. Dechloromonas, one of the most prominent perchlorate reducing bacteria, was identified as the dominant bacterium in the acclimated culture (69.33% of the whole clones). The study demonstrated that the perchlorate-acclimated mixed microorganisms can readily and efficiently realize reduction of highly concentrated perchlorate in wastewater.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ratios used in this study were lower than those used in other literature.
“although ratios used in this study were lower than those used in other literature (Stein et al., 2022;Zhu et al., 2016).”
From Simple and effective remediation strategies of Martian perchlorates (2026) · cites this paper as Zhu et al., 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Simple and effective remediation strategies of Martian perchlorates
Coker, H. R., Denvir, A. C., & Howe, J. A. (2026) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.1002/saj2.70201 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhu, Y., Gao, N., Chu, W., Wang, S., & Xu, J.
- Affiliations
- Tongji University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Gao, Naiyun
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 148
- Pages
- 188-194
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2257983873
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51178321, 51208364)
- National Major Project of Science & Technology Ministry of China (2012ZX07403-001, 2008ZX07421-002)
- Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (2009-K7-4)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Keywords
- perchlorate reduction, Dechloromonas, electron acceptors, nitrate inhibition, sulfate inhibition, time delay, pH and temperature effects, wastewater treatment, bioremediation
- MeSH terms
- Biodegradation, Environmental, Electron Transport, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Kinetics, Nitrates, Oxidation-Reduction, Perchlorates, Sulfates, Temperature, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Betaproteobacteria, Wastewater
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review