Cited by 501Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Bioaugmentation as a strategy for the remediation of pesticide-polluted soil: A review

Cycoń, Mariusz, Mrozik, Agnieszka, Piotrowska-Seget, Zofia·2017·Chemosphere

Abstract

Bioaugmentation, a green technology, is defined as the improvement of the degradative capacity of contaminated areas by introducing specific microorganisms, has emerged as the most advantageous method for cleaning-up soil contaminated with pesticides. The present review discusses the selection of pesticide-utilising microorganisms from various sources, their potential for the degradation of pesticides from different chemical classes in liquid media as well as soil-related case studies in a laboratory, a greenhouse and field conditions. The paper is focused on the microbial degradation of the most common pesticides that have been used for many years such as organochlorinated and organophosphorus pesticides, triazines, pyrethroids, carbamate, chloroacetamide, benzimidazole and derivatives of phenoxyacetic acid. Special attention is paid to bacterial strains from the genera Alcaligenes, Arthrobacter, Bacillus, Brucella, Burkholderia, Catellibacterium, Pichia, Pseudomonas, Rhodococcus, Serratia, Sphingomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Streptomyces and Verticillum, which have potential applications in the bioremediation of pesticide-contaminated soils using bioaugmentation technology. Since many factors strongly influence the success of bioaugmentation, selected abiotic and biotic factors such as pH, temperature, type of soil, pesticide concentration, content of water and organic matter, additional carbon and nitrogen sources, inoculum size, interactions between the introduced strains and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.129

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cycoń, M., Mrozik, A., & Piotrowska-Seget, Z.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Silesia (PL)
  • University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Corresponding author
Cycoń, Mariusz
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
172
Pages
52-71
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2564909299
Cited by
501
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 10
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
bioaugmentation, pesticide-contaminated soil, bioremediation, organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorus pesticides, triazines, pyrethroid insecticides, carbamate pesticides, phenoxyacetic acid derivatives, bacterial degradation, inoculum survival, soil remediation
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Biodegradation, Environmental, Pesticides, Soil Microbiology, Soil Pollutants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review