Cited by 23Arsenic contamination and mitigationHeavy metals in environmentCoal and Its By-products

May humic acids or mineral fertilisation mitigate arsenic mobility and availability to carrot plants (Daucus carota L.) in a volcanic soil polluted by as from irrigation water?

Caporale, Antonio G., Adamo, Paola, Azam, Shah M.G.G., Rao, Maria A., Pigna, Massimo·2018·Chemosphere

Abstract

Carrot (Daucus carota L.) is a widely consumed root vegetable, whose growth and safety might be threatened by growing-medium arsenic (As) contamination. By this work, we evaluated the effects of humic acids from Leonardite and NPK mineral fertilisation on As mobility and availability to carrot plants grown for 60 days in a volcanic soil irrigated with As-contaminated water - representing the most common scenario occurring in As-affected Italian areas. As expected, the irrigation with As-contaminated water caused a serious toxic effect on plant growth and photosynthetic rate; the highest rate of As also inhibited soil enzymatic activity. In contrast, the organic and mineral fertilisation alleviated, at least partially, the toxicity of As, essentially by stimulating plant growth and promoting nutrient uptake. The mobility of As in the volcanic soil and thus its phytoavailability were differently affected by the organic and mineral fertilisers; the application of humic acids mitigated the availability of the contaminant, likely by its partial immobilisation on humic acid sorption sites - thus raising up the intrinsic anionic sorption capacity of the volcanic soil; the mineral fertilisation enhanced the mobility of As in soil, probably due to competition of P for the anionic sorption sites of the soil variable-charge minerals, very affine to available P. These findings hence suggest that a proper soil management of As-polluted volcanic soils and amendment by stable organic matter…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.035

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caporale, A. G., Adamo, P., Azam, S. M. G. G., Rao, M. A., & Pigna, M.
Affiliations
University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Caporale, Antonio G.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
193
Pages
464-471
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767272183
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Italian Research Program of National Interest (2010JBNL17_005)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
Keywords
arsenic, humic acid, leonardite, carrot, arsenic mobility, arsenic bioavailability, irrigation water contamination, volcanic soils, phosphorus competition, soil enzyme activity, plant growth inhibition, photosynthetic rate, soil amendment
MeSH terms
Arsenic, Fertilizers, Humic Substances, Minerals, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Vegetables, Water Pollution, Daucus carota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review