Occurrence of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in garden produce at homes with a history of PFAS-contaminated drinking water
Abstract
The decades-long disposal of manufacturing waste containing perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in landfills resulted in contamination of groundwater serving as the drinking water supply for the eastern Twin Cities metropolitan region. While measures were taken to reduce the levels of PFAS in the drinking water, questions remained about possible non-drinking water pathways of exposure in these communities. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) investigated whether PFAS in water used for yard and garden irrigation results in elevated concentrations of PFAS in soil and home-grown produce. In 2010, samples of outdoor tap water, garden soil, and garden produce were collected at homes impacted by the contamination and analyzed for several PFAS. Perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA) was the primary PFAS present in water, followed by perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA). Although PFBA, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) were present in 100% of soil samples at higher concentrations compared to other PFAS, only PFBA was readily translocated to plants. Significant determinants of PFBA concentration in produce were the amount of PFBA applied to the garden via watering and the type of produce tested. Results from this real-world study are consistent with experimental findings that short-chain PFAS have the highest potential to translocate to and bioaccumulate in edible plants. These findings are globally relevant, as short-chain PFAS serve as commercial substitutes for longer-chain compounds and are increasingly detected in water due to their relatively high solubility and mobility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Minnesota, four sites used by the 3M facility were contaminated by legacy and novel PFAS, including PFBS, PFBA, PFPeA, and PFHxS.
“In Minnesota, four sites used by the 3M facility were also found to be contaminated by legacy and novel PFAS, including PFBS, PFBA, PFPeA, and PFHxS (Scher et al., 2018).”
From Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in water and wastewater: A critical review of their global occurrence and distribution (2022) · cites this paper as Scher et al., 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 194
- Authors
- Scher, D. P., Kelly, J. E., Huset, C. A., Barry, K. M., Hoffbeck, R. W., Yingling, V. L., & Messing, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Minnesota Department of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Scher, Deanna P.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 196
- Pages
- 548-555
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2776422676
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
- Minnesota Department of Health
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
- Keywords
- perfluorinated compounds, perfluorobutanoic acid, PFPeA, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, irrigation water, short-chain PFAS, landfilling, groundwater contamination
- MeSH terms
- Caprylates, Cities, Fluorocarbons, Minnesota, Plants, Edible, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Gardening, Groundwater, Drinking Water
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review