Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Induced Neurotoxicity Responses Associated with Neural Genes Expression, Neurotransmitter Levels and Acetylcholinesterase Activity in Planarians Dugesia Japonica
Abstract
As a persistent and widespread toxic organic pollutant in the environment, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) has the potential to cause great harm to wildlife. In our study, the effects of PFOS on neurodevelopment gene expression, neurotransmitter content, neuronal morphology, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity were examined, and the potential neurotoxicity mechanisms of PFOS were also investigated in planarians, Dugesia japonica. Using quantitative real-time PCR analysis, five neurodevelopmental related genes were measured, among which, DjotxA, DjotxB, DjFoxD, and DjFoxG were found to be down-regulated, while Djnlg was found to be up-regulated, following exposure to PFOS for 10 days compared with control groups. In addition, the neurotransmitters including dopamine, serotonin, and γ-aminobutyricacid as well as the acitivity of AChE were altered by PFOS exposure. Furthermore, PFOS exposure altered brain morphology as well as smaller cephalic ganglia which displayed reduced nerve fiber density decreased brain branches compared to controls. Our results demonstrate that neurotransmission was disturbed after exposure to PFOS and that exposure to this pollutant can cause neurotoxic defects. Results from this study provide valuable information regarding the neuro- and ecological toxicity of PFOS in aquatic animals and aquatic environments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are inconsistencies in the literature regarding the direction of change for dopamine levels with PFAS exposure, with dopamine increasing in some studies and decreasing in others.
“There are inconsistencies in the literature regarding the direction of change for dopamine levels with dopamine increasing with PFAS exposure in some studies and decreasing in others”
From A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances on the Brain and Behavior (2022) · cites this paper as Yuan et al., 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Yuan, Z., Shao, X., Miao, Z., Zhao, B., Zheng, Z., & Zhang, J.
- Affiliations
- Shandong University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Jianyong
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 206
- Pages
- 150-156
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2801616727
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Science and Technology of Shandong Province (J16LE02)
- Shandong University of Technology and Zibo City Integration Development Project (2017ZBXC053)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Keywords
- PFOS, neurotoxicity, Dugesia japonica, Tricladida, acetylcholinesterase activity, neurotransmitter levels, dopamine, serotonin, GABA, brain structure, cephalic ganglia, persistent organic pollutants, aquatic toxicology
- MeSH terms
- Acetylcholinesterase, Animals, Fluorocarbons, Planarians, Gene Expression, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Neurotransmitter Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review