Cited by 64Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Induced Neurotoxicity Responses Associated with Neural Genes Expression, Neurotransmitter Levels and Acetylcholinesterase Activity in Planarians Dugesia Japonica

Yuan, Zuoqing, Shao, Xinxin, Miao, Zili, Zhao, Bosheng, Zheng, Ziyang, Zhang, Jianyong·2018·Chemosphere

Abstract

As a persistent and widespread toxic organic pollutant in the environment, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) has the potential to cause great harm to wildlife. In our study, the effects of PFOS on neurodevelopment gene expression, neurotransmitter content, neuronal morphology, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity were examined, and the potential neurotoxicity mechanisms of PFOS were also investigated in planarians, Dugesia japonica. Using quantitative real-time PCR analysis, five neurodevelopmental related genes were measured, among which, DjotxA, DjotxB, DjFoxD, and DjFoxG were found to be down-regulated, while Djnlg was found to be up-regulated, following exposure to PFOS for 10 days compared with control groups. In addition, the neurotransmitters including dopamine, serotonin, and γ-aminobutyricacid as well as the acitivity of AChE were altered by PFOS exposure. Furthermore, PFOS exposure altered brain morphology as well as smaller cephalic ganglia which displayed reduced nerve fiber density decreased brain branches compared to controls. Our results demonstrate that neurotransmission was disturbed after exposure to PFOS and that exposure to this pollutant can cause neurotoxic defects. Results from this study provide valuable information regarding the neuro- and ecological toxicity of PFOS in aquatic animals and aquatic environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are inconsistencies in the literature regarding the direction of change for dopamine levels with PFAS exposure, with dopamine increasing in some studies and decreasing in others.

    “There are inconsistencies in the literature regarding the direction of change for dopamine levels with dopamine increasing with PFAS exposure in some studies and decreasing in others”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 64

Authors
Yuan, Z., Shao, X., Miao, Z., Zhao, B., Zheng, Z., & Zhang, J.
Affiliations
Shandong University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Jianyong
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
206
Pages
150-156
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801616727
Cited by
64
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Science and Technology of Shandong Province (J16LE02)
  • Shandong University of Technology and Zibo City Integration Development Project (2017ZBXC053)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
PFOS, neurotoxicity, Dugesia japonica, Tricladida, acetylcholinesterase activity, neurotransmitter levels, dopamine, serotonin, GABA, brain structure, cephalic ganglia, persistent organic pollutants, aquatic toxicology
MeSH terms
Acetylcholinesterase, Animals, Fluorocarbons, Planarians, Gene Expression, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Neurotransmitter Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review