The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hybrid decision tree-based machine learning models for short-term water quality prediction
Abstract
Water resources are the foundation of people's life and economic development, and are closely related to health and the environment. Accurate prediction of water quality is the key to improving water management and pollution control. In this paper, two novel hybrid decision tree-based machine learning models are proposed to obtain more accurate short-term water quality prediction results. The basic models of the two hybrid models are extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and random forest (RF), which respectively introduce an advanced data denoising technique - complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN). Taking the water resources of Gales Creek site in Tualatin River (one of the most polluted rivers in the world) Basin as an example, a total of 1875 data (hourly data) from May 1, 2019 to July 20, 2019 are collected. Two hybrid models are used to predict six water quality indicators, including water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH value, specific conductance, turbidity, and fluorescent dissolved organic matter. Six error metrics are introduced as the basis of performance evaluation, and the results of the two models are compared with the other four conventional models. The results reveal that: (1) CEEMDAN-RF performs best in the prediction of temperature, dissolved oxygen and specific conductance, the mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs) are 0.69%, 1.05%, and 0.90%, respectively. CEEMDAN-XGBoost performs best in the prediction of pH value, turbidity, and fluorescent dissolved organic matter, the MAPEs are 0.27%, 14.94%, and 1.59%, respectively. (2) The average MAPEs of CEEMDAN-RF and CEEMMDAN-XGBoost models are the smallest, which are 3.90% and 3.71% respectively, indicating that their overall prediction performance is the best. In addition, the stability of the prediction model is also discussed in this paper. The analysis shows that the prediction stability of CEEMDAN-RF and CEEMDAN-XGBoost is higher than other benchmark models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.02754 · Cited by 7,104
Cited by
Niazkar, M., Menapace, A., Brentan, B., Piraei, R., Jimenez, D., Dhawan, P., & Righetti, M. (2024) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.105971 · Cited by 404
Park, J., Lee, W. H., Kim, K. T., Park, C. Y., Lee, S., & Heo, T.-Y. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155070 · Cited by 243
Accelerating materials discovery using machine learning
Juan, Y., Dai, Y., Yang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2021) · Journal of Materials Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2020.12.010 · Cited by 240
Asadollah, S. B. H. S., Khan, N., Sharafati, A., Shahid, S., Chung, E.-S., & Wang, X.-J. (2022) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-021-02103-z · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, H., & Ma, X.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 249
- Pages
- 126169
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3006101764
- Cited by
- 642
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hybrid decision tree-based machine learning models for short-term water quality prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126169
- The paper
- Lu, H., & Ma, X. (2020). Hybrid decision tree-based machine learning models for short-term water quality prediction. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.