Cited by 285Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

What are the effects of PFAS exposure at environmentally relevant concentrations?

Sinclair, Georgia M., Long, Sara M., Jones, Oliver A.H.·2020·Chemosphere

Abstract

The group of synthetic chemicals known as poly and per-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are currently of high concern to environmental regulators and the public due to their widespread occurrence, resistance to degradation and reported toxicity. However, little data exists on the effects of exposure to PFAS at environmentally relevant concentrations and this hampers the effective management of these compounds. This paper reviews current research on the occurrence and ecotoxicology of PFAS at environmentally relevant doses to assess their potential biological impacts. Hazard Quotient (HQ) analysis was undertaken as part of this assessment. Most PFAS detected in the environment were found to have a HQ risk value of <1 meaning their reported concentrations are below their predicted no effect concentration. This indicates many reported toxic effects of PFAS are, theoretically, unlikely to occur outside the laboratory. However, lack of information on new PFAS as well as their precursors and degradation products, coupled with lack of knowledge of their mixture toxicity means our understanding of the risks of PFAS is incomplete, especially in regard to sub-lethal and/or chronic effects. It is proposed that the development of molecular markers for PFAS exposure are needed to aid in the development of environmental PFAS regulations that are effective in fully protecting the environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127340

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PFAS exposure leads to immune suppression, with multiple studies reporting significant associations between PFAS exposure and reduced immune function, particularly in children.

    “Furthermore, PFAS exposure leads to immune suppression, with multiple studies reporting significant associations between PFAS exposure and reduced immune function, particularly in children.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 137 · Cited by 285

Authors
Sinclair, G. M., Long, S. M., & Jones, O. A. H.
Affiliations
  • Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science (AU)
  • RMIT University (AU)
Corresponding author
Jones, Oliver A.H.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
258
Pages
127340
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034588724
Cited by
285
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
RMIT University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
PFAS, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, ecotoxicology, hazard quotient, environmentally relevant concentrations, predicted no-effect concentration, sublethal effects, chronic toxicity, combined toxicity, environmental regulation
MeSH terms
Environmental Exposure, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Ecotoxicology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review