Graphene oxide transport and retention in biochar media
Abstract
This study explores the use of biochar (BC), an inexpensive filtration media, for removing graphene oxide (GO) contaminants from the aquatic subsurface environments. Mass balance approaches and column dissection tests were used to analyze the retention behavior of GO in a series of model fixed-bed columns as a function of ionic strength (IS) and flowrate. The column based on the biochar media (BC) displayed 3.6-fold higher retention compared to the quartz sand (control). To overcome the challenges of unfavorable electrostatic interactions between GO and BC, we used a facile functionalization strategy to modify the BC surfaces with nanoscale zero-valent iron (BC-nZVI). The BC-nZVI (5:1, w/w) retained 2.6-fold higher amounts of GO compared with bare biochar. Furthermore, the performance of BC-nZVI increased with decreasing values of IS, attributed to the attachment of GO to nZVI where nZVI was partially dissolved by the presence of higher chloride ion at high IS. A better GO retention (86%) at higher IS was observed in BC where the GO was primarily retained due to the higher aggregation via straining.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
nZVI is a nanoparticle gaining recognition in environmental remediation due to its cost-effectiveness, significant surface area, and reducing properties.
“nZVI is a nanoparticle gaining recognition in environmental remediation due to its cost-effectiveness, significant surface area, and reducing properties [32].”
From Application of Biochar in Stormwater Treatment: Experimental and Modeling Investigation (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
Hasan, M. S., Geza, M., Vasquez, R., Chilkoor, G., & Gadhamshetty, V. (2020) · Water, Air, & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-020-04588-w · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Application of Biochar in Stormwater Treatment: Experimental and Modeling Investigation
Hasan, M. S., Vasquez, R., & Geza, M. (2021) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9050860 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“nZVI is a nanoparticle gaining recognition in environmental remediation due to its cost-effectiveness, significant surface area, and reducing properties [32].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Hasan, M. S., Geza, M., Petersen, J. B., & Gadhamshetty, V.
- Affiliations
- South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Geza, Mengistu
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- Pt 1
- Pages
- 128397
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3089274405
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (T-2, RII T-1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
- Keywords
- graphene oxide, biochar, nanoscale zero-valent iron, pollutant retention, fixed-bed column, ionic strength, flow rate, surface functionalization, electrostatic interactions, particle aggregation, mass balance
- MeSH terms
- Charcoal, Graphite, Iron
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review