The DOI matches its Crossref record; 138 of the 138 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An insight into machine learning models era in simulating soil, water bodies and adsorption heavy metals: Review, challenges and solutions
Abstract
The development of computer aid models for heavy metals (HMs) simulation has been remarkably advanced over the past two decades. Several machine learning (ML) models have been developed for modeling HMs over the past two decades with outstanding progress. Although there have been a noticeable number of diverse ML models investigations, it is essential to have an informative vision on the progression of those computer aid models. In the current short review covering the simulation of heavy metals in contaminated soil, water bodies and removal from aqueous solution, numerous aspects on the methodological and conceptual HMs modeling are reviewed and discussed in detail. For instance, the limitation of the classical analytical methods, types of heavy metal dataset, necessity for new versions of ML models exploration, HM input parameters selection, ML models internal parameters tuning, performance metrics selection and the types of the modelled HM. The current review provides few outlooks in understanding the underlying od the ML models application for HM simulation. Tackling these modeling aspects is significantly essential for ML developers and environmental scientists to obtain creditability and scientific consistency in the domain of environmental science. Based on the discussed modeling aspects, it was concluded several future research directions, which will promote environmental scientists for better understanding of the underlying HMs simulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · Cited by 23,674
The Whale Optimization Algorithm
Mirjalili, S., & Lewis, A. (2016) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 · Cited by 14,581
Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Liew, M. W. V., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.23153 · Cited by 13,446
Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G. C., & Bisson, M. (1979) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50043a017 · Cited by 12,052
Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram
Taylor, K. E. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2000jd900719 · Cited by 8,477
An introduction to variable and feature selection
GuyonIsabelle, & ElisseeffAndré (2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944968 · Cited by 7,715
(2008) · Data Mining and Market Intelligence for Optimal Marketing Returns · doi:10.4324/9780080878096-12 · Cited by 6,954
An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection.
Guyon, I., & Elisseeff, A. (2003) · Cited by 6,576
Hazards of heavy metal contamination
Järup, L. (2003) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldg032 · Cited by 6,508
Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals
Jaishankar, M., Tseten, T., Anbalagan, N., Mathew, B. B., & Beeregowda, K. N. (2014) · Interdisciplinary Toxicology · doi:10.2478/intox-2014-0009 · Cited by 6,402
Cited by
Rathi, B. S., Kumar, P. S., & Vo, D.-V. N. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149134 · Cited by 707
A review on magnetic sensors for monitoring of hazardous pollutants in water resources
Hojjati-Najafabadi, A., Mansoorianfar, M., Liang, T., Shahin, K., & Karimi-Maleh, H. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153844 · Cited by 367
RetractedMachine learning in natural and engineered water systems
Huang, R., Ma, C., Ma, J., Huangfu, X., & He, Q. (2021) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2021.117666 · Cited by 319
New strategies on the application of artificial intelligence in the field of phytoremediation
Singh, P., Pani, A., Mujumdar, A. S., & Shirkole, S. S. (2023) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226514.2022.2090500 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Yaseen, Z. M.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 277
- Pages
- 130126
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3139274269
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 138
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An insight into machine learning models era in simulating soil, water bodies and adsorption heavy metals: Review, challenges and solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130126
- The paper
- Yaseen, Z. M. (2021). An insight into machine learning models era in simulating soil, water bodies and adsorption heavy metals: Review, challenges and solutions. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.