Cited by 147Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesSubcritical and Supercritical Water ProcessesMunicipal Solid Waste Management

Wet organic waste treatment via hydrothermal processing: A critical review

Open access
Marzbali, Mojtaba Hedayati, Kundu, Sazal, Halder, Pobitra, Patel, Savankumar, Hakeem, Ibrahim Gbolahan, Paz-Ferreiro, Jorge, Madapusi, Srinivasan, Surapaneni, Aravind +1 more·2021·Chemosphere

Abstract

There are several recent reviews published in the literature on hydrothermal carbonization, liquefaction and supercritical water gasification of lignocellulosic biomass and algae. The potential of hydrochar, bio-oil or synthesis gas production and applications have also been reviewed individually. The comprehensive review on the hydrothermal treatment of wet wastes (such as municipal solid waste, food waste, sewage sludge, algae) covering carbonization, liquefaction and supercritical water gasification, however, is missing in the literature which formed the basis of the current review paper. The current paper critically reviews the literature around the full spectrum of hydrothermal treatment for wet wastes and establishes a good comparison of the different hydrothermal treatment options for managing wet waste streams. Also, the role of catalysts as well as synthesis of catalysts using hydrothermal treatment of biomass has been critically reviewed. For the first time, efforts have also been made to summarize findings on modelling works as well as techno-economic assessments in the area of hydrothermal treatments of wet wastes. The study concludes with key findings, knowledge gaps and future recommendations to improve the productivity of hydrothermal treatment of wet wastes, helping improve the commercial viability and environmental sustainability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130557

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 300 · Cited by 147

Authors
Marzbali, M. H., Kundu, S., Halder, P., Patel, S., Hakeem, I. G., Paz-Ferreiro, J., Madapusi, S., Surapaneni, A., & Shah, K.
Affiliations
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • South East Water (Australia) (AU)
Corresponding author
Shah, Kalpit
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
279
Pages
130557
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3156244425
Cited by
147
References
300
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 14
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
RMIT University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
hydrothermal treatment, hydrothermal carbonization, hydrothermal liquefaction, supercritical water gasification, sewage sludge, food waste, municipal solid waste, algae, hydrochar, bio-oil, syngas, catalysts, catalyst preparation, techno-economic analysis, modeling, waste management
MeSH terms
Carbon, Food, Refuse Disposal, Temperature, Biomass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review