Effect of early high-dose vitamin D3 repletion on cognitive outcomes in critically ill adults
Open accessAbstract
Background Long-term cognitive impairment frequently occurs after critical illness; no treatments are known to improve long-term cognition. Research question Does a single high-dose (540,000 International Units) enteral treatment of vitamin D3 given shortly after hospital admission in critically ill patients who are vitamin D deficient improve long-term global cognition or executive function? Study design and methods This study evaluated long-term cognitive outcomes among patients enrolled in a multicenter, blinded, randomized clinical trial comparing vitamin D3 treatment vs placebo in critically ill adults with vitamin D deficiency. Global cognition was measured by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). Executive function was measured with a composite score derived from three Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System subscales. Outcomes were assessed at a median of 443 days (interquartile range, 390-482 days) after randomization and were compared using multivariate proportional odds regression. Adjusted ORs of > 1.0 would indicate better outcomes in the vitamin D3 group compared with the placebo group. Results Ninety-five patients were enrolled, including 47 patients randomized to vitamin D3 treatment and 48 patients randomized to placebo. The adjusted median RBANS score at follow-up was 79.6 (95% CI, 73.0-84.0) in the vitamin D3 group and 82.1 (95% CI, 74.7-84.6) in the placebo group (adjusted OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.50-1.38). The adjusted median executive function composite scores were 8.1 (95% CI, 6.8-9.0) and 8.7 (95% CI, 7.4-9.3), respectively (adjusted OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.36-1.42). Interpretation In vitamin D-deficient, critically-ill adults, a large dose of enteral vitamin D3 did not improve long-term global cognition or executive function. Trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03733418; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High-quality RCTs evaluating high doses of selenium, vitamin D, vitamin C, and combinations of vitamin C and thiamine revealed no hard clinical benefit of such interventions.
“High-quality RCTs evaluating high doses of selenium [99], vitamin D [100,101], vitamin C [102e108], and combinations of vitamin C and thiamine [109], revealed no hard clinical benefit of such interventions.”
From ESPEN practical and partially revised guideline: Clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit (2023) · cites this paper as [100]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN practical and partially revised guideline: Clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit
Singer, P., Blaser, A. R., Berger, M. M., Calder, P. C., Casaer, M., Hiesmayr, M., Mayer, K., Montejo-Gonzalez, J. C., Pichard, C., Preiser, J.-C., et al. (2023) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2023.07.011 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
- Authors
- Han, J. H., Ginde, A. A., Brown, S. M., Baughman, A., Collar, E. M., Ely, E. W., Gong, M. N., Hope, A. A., Hou, P. C., Hough, C. L., Iwashyna, T. J., Jackson, J. C., Khan, A., Orun, O. M., Patel, M. B., Raman, R., Rice, T. W., Ringwood, N., Semler, M. W., Shapiro, N. I., Talmor, D. S., & Self, W. H.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Han, Jin H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Chest
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 909-918
- ISSN
- 0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8449000
- OpenAlex
- W3144214964
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- National Heart Lung and Blood Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
- Keywords
- vitamin D3, vitamin D deficiency, critical illness, post-intensive care syndrome, cognitive impairment, executive function, global cognition, enteral supplementation, long-term cognitive outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Long Term Adverse Effects, Cholecalciferol, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Vitamin D Deficiency, Vitamins, Critical Illness, Treatment Outcome, Pulse Therapy, Drug, Executive Function, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review