Cited by 273Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsChild Abuse and Trauma

Alexithymia as a mediator between childhood trauma and self-injurious behaviors

Paivio, Sandra C, McCulloch, Chantal R·2004·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to test whether alexithymia mediates the relationship between childhood maltreatment and self-injurious behaviors (SIB) in college women.Method The sample was comprised of 100 female undergraduate students. Measures were the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire [D. Bernstein, L. Fink, Manual for the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, The Psychological Corporation, New York, 1998], the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 [Journal of Psychosomatic Research 38 (1994) 23; Journal of Psychosomatic Research 38 (1994) 33], and the Self-Injurious Behaviors Questionnaire which assessed the lifetime frequency of six methods of superficial self-injury (hair pulling, head banging, punching, scratching, cutting, and burning). Regression analyses were used to test the proposed mediational model.Results Forty-one percent of respondents reported having engaged in SIB; most engaged in multiple methods, and self-cutting was the most frequently endorsed method. Results of regression analyses supported the proposed mediational model for all types of maltreatment except sexual abuse. Sexual abuse, considered alone, was not significantly associated with alexithymia which precluded testing for mediational effects.Conclusions Results support a link between a history of childhood maltreatment and SIB among college women and the hypothesis that alexithymia mediates this relationship.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.11.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 273

Authors
Paivio, S. C., & McCulloch, C. R.
Affiliations
University of Windsor (CA)
Corresponding author
Paivio, Sandra C
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
339-354
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081017249
Cited by
273
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
alexithymia, child abuse, self-harm, mediation, sexual abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse, neglect, female university students, self-cutting, Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, female undergraduates, psychosomatic symptoms, somatic symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Canada, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Self-Assessment, Students, Universities, Prevalence, Self-Injurious Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review