Alexithymia as a mediator between childhood trauma and self-injurious behaviors
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to test whether alexithymia mediates the relationship between childhood maltreatment and self-injurious behaviors (SIB) in college women.Method The sample was comprised of 100 female undergraduate students. Measures were the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire [D. Bernstein, L. Fink, Manual for the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, The Psychological Corporation, New York, 1998], the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 [Journal of Psychosomatic Research 38 (1994) 23; Journal of Psychosomatic Research 38 (1994) 33], and the Self-Injurious Behaviors Questionnaire which assessed the lifetime frequency of six methods of superficial self-injury (hair pulling, head banging, punching, scratching, cutting, and burning). Regression analyses were used to test the proposed mediational model.Results Forty-one percent of respondents reported having engaged in SIB; most engaged in multiple methods, and self-cutting was the most frequently endorsed method. Results of regression analyses supported the proposed mediational model for all types of maltreatment except sexual abuse. Sexual abuse, considered alone, was not significantly associated with alexithymia which precluded testing for mediational effects.Conclusions Results support a link between a history of childhood maltreatment and SIB among college women and the hypothesis that alexithymia mediates this relationship.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alexithymia is an important mediator which increases risk of NSSI in people who have experienced life adversity such as childhood abuse and bullying.
“Others have identified alexithymia as an important mediator which increases the risk of NSSI in people who have experienced different types of life adversity, such as childhood abuse and bullying [16, 21–23].”
From A 'choice', an 'addiction', a way 'out of the lost': Exploring self-injury in autistic people without intellectual disability (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 273
- Authors
- Paivio, S. C., & McCulloch, C. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Windsor (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Paivio, Sandra C
- Venue
- Child Abuse & Neglect
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 339-354
- ISSN
- 0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081017249
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- alexithymia, child abuse, self-harm, mediation, sexual abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse, neglect, female university students, self-cutting, Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, female undergraduates, psychosomatic symptoms, somatic symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affective Symptoms, Canada, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Self-Assessment, Students, Universities, Prevalence, Self-Injurious Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review