Cited by 184Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesSex work and related issues

A meta-analysis of the relationship of child sexual abuse to HIV risk behavior among women

Arriola, Kimberly R.J., Louden, Tracy, Doldren, Michelle A., Fortenberry, Ranita M.·2005·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Objective This study is a meta-analysis of the literature exploring the relationship between child sexual abuse (CSA) and HIV risk behavior among women. Four outcome variables were tested: unprotected sex; sex with multiple partners; sex trading; and adult sexual revictimization.Method Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, and separate meta-analyses were performed for each of the four dependent variables described above.Results Using the correlation coefficient r as an effect size estimate, results indicate an average effect size of .05 for the unprotected sex meta-analysis (N = 16 studies), .13 for the sex with multiple partners meta-analysis (N = 23 studies), .12 for the sex trading meta-analysis (N = 23 studies), and .17 for the adult sexual revictimization meta-analysis (N = 21 studies). We conducted a test of three potential moderator variables (source of sample, definition of CSA based on type of contact, and definition of CSA based on maximum age of victim). Results did not support the hypothesis that these three variables explain a significant amount of variability in effect sizes with one exception: Studies that define CSA more broadly to include adolescent victims (e.g., victims up to 17 years of age) had larger and more homogenous effect sizes for the sex trading meta-analysis than those that defined CSA as having occurred at younger ages.Conclusions These findings suggest a small positive relationship between CSA and subsequent HIV risk behavior among women that varies as a function of how CSA and HIV risk behavior are operationalized.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.10.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have reported associations between childhood sexual abuse and psychosocial problems, self-harm, psychiatric disorders, and physical health diagnoses such as HIV and obesity.

    “Studies have reported associations between childhood sexual abuse and many psychosocial and health-related outcomes, including psychosocial problems,2,3 self-harm,4 psychiatric disorders,5–7 and physical health diagnoses such as HIV8 and obesity.9”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 184

Authors
Arriola, K. R. J., Louden, T., Doldren, M. A., & Fortenberry, R. M.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
725-746
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088811155
Cited by
184
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sex work and related issues
Keywords
child sexual abuse, HIV risk behavior, women, unprotected sex, multiple sexual partners, sex work, sexual revictimization, child victims, definition of abuse
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Risk-Taking, HIV Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review